Pastor Bill wrote:paul wrote:Pastor Bill wrote:paul wrote:dawgs10 wrote:and cogop backed you. hmmm, sounds like maybe its not the same church that paul and ron remember.
talk to others on this board who are in similar situation and the church has not move forward very much. Also what movement has been done is mostly on the local level. Recounting several statements it appears that GH is running fast and furious to try to keep pace with the local church. So yep it does seem like the same-o-same-o
BUT isn't that what you have promoted? Local churches following God, and the organization being more of a resource center working to keep up with the diversity of locally run more independent churches? (I thought this was a good thing?)
Prayerfully without being misunderstood I will comment.
Yes you are right and certinally this is what I believe in strong local churches. My reference is that IMHO it should be the GH that is setting the pace. Personally it appears that the local churches are setting the pace.
Isn't that somewhat contradictory in terms? We don't want everything coming down from GH, we want the freedom to run ahead, but then don't like to find that we are ahead and GH is the one "keeping up"?
Bill, I will respond but let me prefece it first. What I am sharing is not about cogop, IQ, nor my organization. It is simple facts that are key in organizational leadership.
Whenever you are a part of an organization it is for a reason. You expect something from them and they in turn from you. It is a tw way street or their would be no purpose for either party to be joined together.
Generally it is the General Organization that must set the pace for the others to follow.
Let me give you an example: When I left cogop their was a few years between my pastorates. I had to find a job, provide for my family. I took a job at a factory in Dallas. This particular factory was one of 90 plants in the corporation. This particular plant had not turned a profit in 20 years, and mostly was kept open as a tax write off.
The corporate office made a desision to change that, gave the local plant flexability to make changes. They hire myself, as plant superintendant, a new general manage, and a new plant manager. Together as the General leaders of this plant we had to set the pace and direction that we were going in. We were demanding certain things form our workers, and in order to get that we had to make sure they had the resources to do what we were expecting from them. the details are long, we had opsition in cross training from unions... but in the long run the results were first year we broke even, no loss...second year profit small, third year $250,000 profit and the fourth year close to $1,000,000 profit for the company.
We had to set the pace ( GH ) but could not do it without strong departments within the plant ( local churches ) As the leaders we could not lag behind what the departments were ignited to do, nor could we as leaders set our pace and leave the departments behind. the departments could not just do their thing apart from the whole.
The end result. Stong leadership from the top, direction, resources, strong departments, stong organization and profits.
This is my form of leadership that I practice. again this is just a micro cosom. It would take to much space to give all the details.
You cannot effectively love and minister to others when you are obsessed with protecting
and preserving yourself.