Catchers or not, biblically, the guy goes to a pentecostal church and does what every living, breathing pentecostal person in America is accustomed to seeing done, and says in his pleadings that it was "in the spirit", and sues for it?!?
Can you imagine putting on evidence of 100 years of American pentecostal history to demonstrate that catchers are not a guaranteed part of the package? I can't. And, in this church, if they did have a custom of catchers, did fallers take numbers so catchers could be there? Was there a cue that a person is about to fall, so you'd better run catch 'em? This just seems to me to be about the most frivolous lawsuit I've ever heard of, and I mean about as bad as the judge suing over his pants at the dry cleaner.
Does he still go that church? Would he tithe from the insurance money back to the church?

Is this whole thing a collusion by him and the church to get some easy cash???? All kinds of theories could be formed --- but in the end, not much of a case, IMO.
Human government bears the same relation to hell as the church bears to heaven. (David Lipscomb, On Civil Government, 72).