Pastor Gary wrote:We are trying to determine whether one's morality/Theology affects one's vote and, conversely, whether one's vote is indicative of one's morality/Theology.
I quite doubt that anyone disputes that it does. But I think your initial question was meant to imply that anyone who voted for Obama is morally inconsistent or derelict. I didn't meet you yesterday, Gary, neither was I born afterwards.
Pastor Gary wrote:It's funny how any time that legitimate question is asked, the knee-jerk response is to point out the perceived moral failings of whichever party is most disliked...
Yes, Jude 2 is quite the funny place. Why should my post be taken to be anything other than a contribution that challenges the implied assumption that the question is only obvious from one perspective?
Pastor Gary wrote:unjust war/abortion?
Morally equivalent? Yes.
Pastor Gary wrote:Economic disparity/promotion of perversion?
Systemic, gross economic disparity is perversion.
Pastor Gary wrote:Capitalism/Socialism?
Morally equivalent? As both are actually practised? Yes. In theory? Yes, too, because in theory both are supposed to be good.
Pastor Gary wrote:Are all of these moral equivalents?
It depends on how you frame them. A one dollar bill is not the equivalent of a ten dollar bill, but is a ten dollar bill equivalent to eleven one dollar bills? Should a person pay off a $1,000,000 debt before paying off twenty $1000 debts? Which one is more important? Which one can be accomplished the soonest? Is there virtue in accomplishing three small things because they can be accomplished rather than attempting to accomplish one big thing that probably can't? All good questions. Some people calculate the pros and cons differently than others.
Pastor Gary wrote:Is it possible to have a theoretical discussion that doesn't descend into a partisan sandbox fight?
Not when there are a bunch of partisans present, apparently.
![Remember our veterans and troops currently serving today. [amer-ribbon90.gif]](/images/amer-ribbon90.gif)