DaJudge wrote:Even Nancy Pelosi didn't support impeachment of Cheney. Nor did Obama, or any of the other Dem. presidential candidates.
The Dems made the decision not to pursue impeachment for political reasons. Impeachment is merely a House authorization for the Senate to try the impeached defendent. There is good reason to try Dick Cheney for coercing the CIA to forge evidence to make a false case for war to the American people. Even if he is innocent, the evidence is inclupatory, and a trial by the Senate is warranted.
Here is an account of the allegation:
A White House Forgery Scandal?
Here is the testimony of Robert Richer that the order came on White House stationary:
The Way of the World excerpt. I saw Ron Suskind interviewed about his interview with Richer, and his body language expressed that he was telling the truth. The next day I saw Condi Rice deny Suskind's report, and her body language expressed that she was lying. Richer denied that he said the things on the tape, but I believe he was pressured to deny them. Suskind has the interview on tape, and I am confident that the tapes, when released to posterity, will show that Suskind is telling the truth. I am confident of this because the transcript rings true, because there is independent testimony and evidence that the administration did attempt to coerce the CIA, and because Suskind's body language clearly expressed that he was telling the truth, while Rice's clearly expressed that she was obfuscating.
Here is the
Senate Report that corroberates that the President and Vice President made false claims about the nuclear program to win support for the war.
Here is an account of
Andrew Johnson's impeachment, which shows both that to impeach is a political decision and that it may be deemed warranted for crimes less severe than the crime Cheney allegedly committed.
"And just when you think you've got me figured out, remember, No man ever steps in the same river twice, for it is not the same river and he is not the same man." --Heraclitus