Page 1 of 2
Is Jude 2 faster now?
Posted: January 3rd, 2007, 12:57 pm
by Jeremy Gault
Okay, all of you are now involuntarily involved in testing a new database server here at WinWorld. It is hosting the MySQL database for Jude 2. This was just implemented a few minutes ago (about 6PM on Wednesday.) Does it seem any faster to you, slower, the same, or what? Vote in our poll!
Posted: January 3rd, 2007, 1:35 pm
by Shellie
Give me a minute and I'll let ya know.
Posted: January 3rd, 2007, 1:39 pm
by forestwalker
J2's speed tends to vary but it's faster than average right now.
Posted: January 3rd, 2007, 2:29 pm
by pastorjason
sorry to mess up your test it may be my computer I have just run ck disc and cleaned up the files a little and am now typing at the correct speed but when I voted it had been real slow.
Jason
Posted: January 3rd, 2007, 2:33 pm
by Billy n NC
It does appear to be running faster..
One of my viewing habits here on J2 is to go to the last page of members list and work my way back looking at users websites.
I wish more would fill that field in with personal, church , website etc ..
Posted: January 3rd, 2007, 2:53 pm
by Sherry
Faster for me! 
Posted: January 3rd, 2007, 2:56 pm
by pitts47150
Posted: January 3rd, 2007, 3:05 pm
by TW
Couldn't really tell you for sure as I'm on my sister's computer. I just tripled the RAM on this computer so I don't know how much speed increase to attribute to the server and how much to the increased RAM. Sorry.
TW
Posted: January 3rd, 2007, 4:32 pm
by Gerald Creasy
A little; Possibly.
Posted: January 3rd, 2007, 4:39 pm
by RamboPreacher
perception. The challenge is to have as few variables as possible. It has been a while, but a few weeks ago, I was looking at the times it takes to render a page for reading.
The times varied because of signatures, images and avatars in the particular thread being opened bandwidth, hopcount etc.... However, the times were as quick as .3nnn seconds to about 27.nnnn seconds. Mostly in the 1-7 seconds range
Currently when I opened a sampling of pages, the times varied as well, but the times seem to be a bit more consistent in about 2-5 second range.
I voted slower, but my comment is that it seems more consistent, based on my sampling.
Posted: January 4th, 2007, 12:09 am
by Kevin
Waaaaayyyyyy faster!!!
Posted: January 4th, 2007, 12:47 am
by RuSKY
Seems quite a bit faster to me.
RuSKY
Posted: January 4th, 2007, 4:46 am
by Paully_44
I voted no because I havent noticed a difference.
Posted: January 4th, 2007, 8:53 am
by teach
no difference here either
wendy k
Posted: January 4th, 2007, 9:46 am
by lady4jc
Seems like since I changed computers it is faster. Everything is slow on my other one.