Page 1 of 2

Who do you endorse?

Posted: November 13th, 2007, 7:29 am
by DeWayneTN
Today the Right to Life organization endorsed Fred Thompson. Robertson endorsed Guiliani. Chuck Norris endorsed Huckabee. As of right now, where do you stand? Who are you leaning toward? You can explain why or just simply leave your vote.

Posted: November 13th, 2007, 7:47 am
by Paully_44
Honestly, not sure yet of candiate or party

Posted: November 13th, 2007, 8:43 am
by Shellie
Okay, Hillary Clinton endorser stand up and admit it. :roll:

Posted: November 13th, 2007, 8:55 am
by TW
Shellie wrote:Okay, Hillary Clinton endorser stand up and admit it. :roll:


It's either teach or Gerald. :roll: :lol: :lol: :lol:


TW

Posted: November 13th, 2007, 8:55 am
by DaJudge
Shellie wrote:Okay, Hillary Clinton endorser stand up and admit it. :roll:


I thought Phil Hoover was banned from Jude 2?

Posted: November 13th, 2007, 9:09 am
by DeWayneTN
Hillary Clinton I can kinda believe. But John Edwards? Seriously?

Posted: November 13th, 2007, 9:57 am
by Gerald Creasy
TW wrote:
Shellie wrote:Okay, Hillary Clinton endorser stand up and admit it. :roll:


It's either teach or Gerald. :roll: :lol: :lol: :lol:


TW



apoplectic \āp'ə-plěk'tĭk\ adj

1) of, resembling, or produced by apoplexy: an apoplectic fit.
2) Extremely angry; furious "Preterntural curmudgeon Gerald was apoplectic to find he had been misunderstood....AGAIN"

Posted: November 13th, 2007, 10:23 am
by MacUser
Somebody MUST have chosen Hillary as a joke. I agree it's funny with you.

Posted: November 13th, 2007, 11:25 am
by teach
TW wrote:
Shellie wrote:Okay, Hillary Clinton endorser stand up and admit it. :roll:


It's either teach or Gerald. :roll: :lol: :lol: :lol:


TW


why in the world would you think it was me?! I would never vote for her, so it must've been gerald!

wendy k

Posted: November 13th, 2007, 12:37 pm
by turbotim
Hey Wendy, He was saying that because of the whole Nancy Polosi thing that happened way back.

I know you didn't vote for Hillary...

Posted: November 13th, 2007, 1:54 pm
by EagerBeaver
It was me.

Posted: November 13th, 2007, 2:05 pm
by HogWild
I selected Fred Thompson - but I have to admit that I am certainly not firmly decided! There are others I think I might consider if I did not feel I would be 'throwing away' my vote.

Posted: November 13th, 2007, 2:33 pm
by dolfan
If someone were to put a gun to my head today, I'd vote for Giuliani, but otherwise, I'm very undecided. I'm not crazy about Rudy G, but I'd do it as a last resort if there's no better choice. So far, the issue is who's better than him? Huckabee's coming on strong, but I just don't know enough about the guy yet.

Fred Thompson will not get my vote at this point. The guy just seems lazy to me, and the blurb on Drudge the other day about him saying he doubts he'll be elected --- well, if you don't believe you'll win, why should I waste my time?? You're not a candidate of such lofty ideology (i.e., Ron Paul's libertarianism, however flawed he may be personally and his views on 9/11), so the vote on principle is no good on FT. Basically, he looks the part and has a commanding voice and some rhetorical skills -- other than that, I just don't see much there. I'm still open, though. But, if first impressions matter....... no, thanks.

Posted: November 13th, 2007, 2:58 pm
by teach
turbotim wrote:Hey Wendy, He was saying that because of the whole Nancy Polosi thing that happened way back.

I know you didn't vote for Hillary...


oh, I completely forgot about that.

wendy k

Posted: November 13th, 2007, 3:43 pm
by pastorables
HogWild wrote:I selected Fred Thompson -


I also selected Fred, but only due to the fact that Haley Barbour hasn't announced yet. :D

pa