Page 1 of 1
Is there a Doctrine in the house?
Posted: May 27th, 2008, 5:35 pm
by THE RAzEr
There certainly is. If I continually brought up doctrinal issues, I would be asked to take them to the part of the forum where they should be discussed. The continue discussion of who is or who is not a deceiver or heretic is a doctrinal issue. Is there a doctrine in the House?
Ray
Posted: May 27th, 2008, 5:46 pm
by EagerBeaver
I agree with this post, especially since we have been asked by the moderators of this forum kindly to place our threads in the proper forum.
Posted: May 27th, 2008, 5:50 pm
by pastorables
True, but the Lakeland Revival is a current general topic on many boards and isn't doctrinal. The issues you bring up are intertwined with Todd Bentley/Lakeland Revival by association.
pa
Posted: May 27th, 2008, 6:02 pm
by EagerBeaver
pastorables wrote:True, but the Lakeland Revival is a current general topic on many boards and isn't doctrinal. The issues you bring up are intertwined with Todd Bentley/Lakeland Revival by association.
pa
I see that in part but it has turned doctrinal by many people questioning and others defending what is going on in the crusade and comparing them to Scripture.
Re: Is there a Doctrine in the house?
Posted: May 27th, 2008, 6:51 pm
by Pastor Gary
THE RAzEr wrote:There certainly is. If I continually brought up doctrinal issues, I would be asked to take them to the part of the forum where they should be discussed. The continue discussion of who is or who is not a deceiver or heretic is a doctrinal issue. Is there a doctrine in the House?
Ray
Thanks, Ray. One of the only "privileges" I have as owner of Jude2 is the ability to break the rules at will.
Re: Is there a Doctrine in the house?
Posted: May 27th, 2008, 8:13 pm
by THE RAzEr
Pastor Gary wrote:THE RAzEr wrote:There certainly is. If I continually brought up doctrinal issues, I would be asked to take them to the part of the forum where they should be discussed. The continue discussion of who is or who is not a deceiver or heretic is a doctrinal issue. Is there a doctrine in the House?
Ray
Thanks, Ray. One of the only "privileges" I have as owner of Jude2 is the ability to break the rules at will.
I have withdrawn this comment.
Posted: May 28th, 2008, 12:57 am
by Shellie
Eagerbeaver wrote:
I agree with this post, especially since we have been asked by the moderators of this forum kindly to place our threads in the proper forum.
Didn't see it as doctrinal and we don't have a forum for "Trying the Spirits."
Posted: May 28th, 2008, 3:30 am
by THE RAzEr
Shellie wrote:Eagerbeaver wrote:I agree with this post, especially since we have been asked by the moderators of this forum kindly to place our threads in the proper forum.
Didn't see it as doctrinal and we don't have a forum for "Trying the Spirits."
"Trying the Sprits" use to be a doctrinal issue, but i think it has become OK to ttry a little socially now and then just so you don't get drunk.
Ray