Jude 2

BESIDES having NO BIBLE to support the idea, The WORLD has always been on a One WorlD financial system: It's called moneychanging.

I can go to a bank and exchange dollars for deutchmarks, yen, pounds, or whatever currency I need. I can even use that money to buy things to barter with in any backwards part of the world.

Moneychangers were even set up in the last Jewish temple.

WHAT difference would a mythological ONE WORLD FINANCIAL system make?

Gerald Creasy wrote:WHAT difference would a mythological ONE WORLD FINANCIAL system make?

Everybody's bank account routing number would start with "666" ?

Paully_44 wrote:

Gerald Creasy wrote:WHAT difference would a mythological ONE WORLD FINANCIAL system make?

Everybody's bank account routing number would start with "666" ?

That a good one
But really under one world system, then if that one system would fall then what? You would not sell or buy without

Gerald Creasy wrote:BESIDES having NO BIBLE to support the idea, The WORLD has always been on a One WorlD financial system: It's called moneychanging.

I can go to a bank and exchange dollars for deutchmarks, yen, pounds, or whatever currency I need. I can even use that money to buy things to barter with in any backwards part of the world.

Moneychangers were even set up in the last Jewish temple.

WHAT difference would a mythological ONE WORLD FINANCIAL system make?

First let me say that I do believe that Christ will come back. As far as when, how , if Israel ( if at all ) has a part. What the endtime world would look like, as far as one system, one government, one false religion. God himself only knows for sure.

It is so easy to read things into the current world mess we find ourselves in. So Gerald I don't think your in error for your view. I could not embrace it 100%..simply because I have absolutely no way to know or be certain. So I will continue to just preach the word in the way I believe God has directed me to.

Gerald Creasy wrote:

WHAT difference would a mythological ONE WORLD FINANCIAL system make?

It is called power and control. The ones that control the money controls every things else.

oletimer wrote:

Gerald Creasy wrote:

WHAT difference would a mythological ONE WORLD FINANCIAL system make?

It is called power and control. The ones that control the money controls every things else.

So you are saying that a "one world Financial system" will allow people with money to have power and control?

Won't they be excited!???

Donald trump must be itchin for just a little power.

Has more power then I woiuld like to see him have.

So you are saying that a "one world Financial system" will allow people with money to have power and control?

Won't they be excited!???

Its not a game for them and I say them as there are certain people and groups that all ready control a major portion of the wealth in the world today. History will bare this out.

I don't know all the in's and out's, but I know that money will have a large part in the ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT. Money repersents POWER. But I didn't have to tell you that cause you all ready new that didn't you?

Gerald Creasy wrote:WHAT difference would a mythological ONE WORLD FINANCIAL system make?

Gerald,

You will need to ask China and Russia. They are two of the major players calling for reforms in the way the world does business. Again, this doesn't have to be predicted in scripture. Just read your newspaper each day.

Could they possibly desire a socialist party for the entire world? Interestingly, that would make an Obama presidency very inviting wouldn't it?

pa

pastorables wrote:

Gerald Creasy wrote:WHAT difference would a mythological ONE WORLD FINANCIAL system make?

Gerald,

You will need to ask China and Russia. They are two of the major players calling for reforms in the way the world does business. Again, this doesn't have to be predicted in scripture. Just read your newspaper each day.

Could they possibly desire a socialist party for the entire world? Interestingly, that would make an Obama presidency very inviting wouldn't it?

pa

Why does "REFORMS in the way business is done" mean ONE WORLD FINANCIAL SYSTEM and ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT when YOU hear it?

And YES if you are going to say "these are the times of the end as foretold in the Bible" you should be able to put up the Bible to prove it.

You can not.

You only appeal to your spirituality which is better and higher than every one who disagrees with you.

Gerald Creasy wrote:And YES if you are going to say "these are the times of the end as foretold in the Bible" you should be able to put up the Bible to prove it.

You can not.

Actually, end times can be foretold by the Bible, even though I would agree that a financial system alone would not be the best criteria.

Gerald Creasy wrote:
You only appeal to your spirituality which is better and higher than every one who disagrees with you.

Gerald, you have made this kind of statement more than once of recent. We obviously do not agree on many things, but I have never portrayed that anyone must believe as I do.

This is a lie and if you believe this about me... you don't know me very well. Ask the ones who know me best. Why do you always have to be about throwing sticks and stones?

pa

Gerald Creasy wrote:Why does "REFORMS in the way business is done" mean ONE WORLD FINANCIAL SYSTEM......when YOU hear it?

I can answer this. Because that is what the world leaders are asking for. In the last two weeks, China, Russia, France, and Mexico have asked for a one world financial system. Their exact words. No end times theology, just plain facts. Saw it for myself in the speeches and requests.

Since I teach Accounting and Personal Finance, we have been spending time everyday going over what has been going on world wide financially and how it affects us and what the effect will be on our finances based on our decisions as a nation. This fall, the news has been writing the material. No textbook needed.

pastorables wrote:Gerald, you have made this kind of statement more than once of recent. We obviously do not agree on many things, but I have never portrayed that anyone must believe as I do.

This is a lie and if you believe this about me... you don't know me very well. Ask the ones who know me best. Why do you always have to be about throwing sticks and stones?

pa

It is not a lie. It is what you have stated.

You can NOT state that you believe the way you do because the spirit is leading you [which you have], AND then state that I do not see it because I am blind [which you have] WITHOUT it being an appeal to spiritual superiority [i e The spirit leads ME, you say, you're just low class]

It is part and parcel. You're just too "holy' to say it frankly.

It's all you have to stand on because you can NOT prove your belief from scripture. You believe what you want, based mainly on hearsay. Answer no question which warrant an answer. And run to the high hill of holiness everythime your ideas are threatened by sound questions.

I throw sticks and stones at the self-righteous. If you're getting hit check yourself.

Again, those who know me are cognizant of the truth.

Be blessed,
pa

pastorables wrote:Again, those who know me are cognizant of the truth.

Be blessed,
pa

And what is that truth but what you have told me?

I am blind (your words) because I don't believe what has been revealed TO YOU by your spirituality (your claim).

How then am I NOT cognizant of the truth?

Gerald Creasy wrote:You can NOT state that you believe the way you do because the spirit is leading you [which you have], AND then state that I do not see it because I am blind [which you have] WITHOUT it being an appeal to spiritual superiority [i e The spirit leads ME, you say, you're just low class]

I throw sticks and stones at the self-righteous. If you're getting hit check yourself.

Hey Gerald, just want to interject something here for all of us to think about. John 16:13 says : However, when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will show you things to come.

This is a factual statement revieled from the scriptures that the Holy Spirit of God will come to us and reveil the things He hears from God to us so our understanding may be complete. That being said, many of us, you, I, pastorables, Pastor Gary, Shellie, etc. etc. are on a path of understanding and obeidence (hopefully) to our Lord. Some may be in this place, some that. Some may be here, some there. To say if someone declares what the Spirit may have revieled to them is paramount to being self rightious and holier than thou is a little short sighted and contentious in my humble opinion.
You and I have had very respectful and curdious dialog on many occasions. If you or I was to make a statement about what the Holy Spirit may or may not have revieled to each of us is not self rightious it's merly informative. I may not be at the same place or time along my spiritual walk with the Lord than you. Nor you than I. However, that doesn't have to make our informative statements toward each other to be from a perspective of self rightious behaviour and slander.

Anyway...hope this helps. I don't know pastorables on a personal level at all. But just from the things I have read here and there on Jude2 I would say that he is a fair and balanced enough guy.

God bless