Jude 2

Read this in the Washington Times, was curious what you all thought.

I voted for Michael Steele. He is a very charismatic and intelligent conservative that, I believe, has the talent and ability to inspire a new generation of conservatives while simultaneously appealing to the traditionalists.

I cast my vote for "other," and that would be none other than Condi Rice.

I voted for Steele as well. He appears to have it all together.

I like Newt alot, but think he would be better suited as something else.

KB

I think and hope it is Michael Steele.

Newt Gingrich has a lot of baggage tied to him from the Clinton years. While Gingrich is a good speaker and has good ideas, he is best outside of the spotlight of RNC chair.

According to what I have read, Gingrich is not seeking to head the RNC, only Steele. Steele is asking for Newt's support. So perhaps that settles the issue, or perhaps not.

According to local news, Fred Thompson is considering it. He is a true conservative in the mold of Reagan.

MrDanger wrote:According to local news, Fred Thompson is considering it. He is a true conservative in the mold of Reagan.

If their goal is a "rebranding" they'll go younger than Fred.

rjjunior wrote:

MrDanger wrote:According to local news, Fred Thompson is considering it. He is a true conservative in the mold of Reagan.

If their goal is a "rebranding" they'll go younger than Fred.

I don't know, sticking it to the pundits by going even older could be hilarious . . .





But it probably wouldn't win any elections.

I love Fred and wish he would have put more in his campaign and started earlier I would have loved to seen him as the candidate over McCain, he just did not put as much effort in it.

I am hoping to see more of him in the next few years.

Condi is pro-choice and would make a horrible RNC chair.