Jennifer Smith wrote:Dolfan, even though I'm sure you were trying not to be, that sounded a bit judgmental...

The problem isn't just in charismatic circles- there are sin problems in other denominations. IMO, the point is not to point a finger but to self-examine and to see how we are doing as individuals, how we're influencing our own sphere, and to watch each one's own life and doctrine. I hate to see division and finger-pointing, because it fails to recognize the problem in "the church" at large. There is a problem, and it isn't going away without a revival. Christians should be in love with Jesus and taking a stand for righteousness in the way that Christ did. Jesus was not wishy-washy, and we shouldn't be either.
J. Lee Grady is a messenger here- he wants people to recognize what is happening, and I don't think it is fair to insinuate he is responsible. There are those who fall and those who are nearby. It isn't fair to call those nearby the problem. Hank Hanegraaf has been nearby others who fell, and he has had problems of his own for years. But, I'm sure he means well.
I respect that Rev. Grady is being a messenger. What he says is true. The issue is not who all has problems, though. You're right, many do. We all do, right? Some of us even have sin problems. That's the pinpoint of Grady's analysis -- that these ministries are acting sinfully, and that they and all who suppor them need a sobriety check, to put it kindly. That Hannegraaf has skeletons in his own closets is beside the point that Grady and Charisma magazine have benefitted directly by promoting those very ministries he now treats like they're radioactive. It looks to me like a 180 degree turn. Charismatic worship and church life are tied inextricably to these ministries. They have no real identity outside of them. Unlike old fashioned pentecostal faith, (if you just eliminate the sort of old-timey backwoods aspects of that faith, which is an unfair stereotype IMO), the charismatics are driven by and represent that God's favored tools are found in the theatrics, histrionics, financial trickery, imaginary doctrines pushed by supposedly supernatural personalities and all that .... mess. What I knew of pentecostal faith was old people, tried and true in the faith of Jesus, praying and fasting, reading their bibles and agonizing for others, and eating a lot of fried foods.

They were poor or rich, they were educated and unlearned, they were smooth talking or couldn't speak half-proper English. But, good Lord, they were honest and they would give you what you needed and they would sit up with you all night and pray simply for God to move or bless or help or heal or whatever. They might speak in tongues, but they didn't use the latest catch phrases from TBN or blow on you or laugh like a hyena or tell of finding gold teeth, keys or anything else gold (good grief, they'd have had a heart attack and thought they were bound for hell if they'd had a gold anything

). And, they'd cry and they'd laugh and they'd just flat out care. They wouldn't take your money, but they'd offer you a little bit of the last of theirs as much as they could. They wouldn't ask for your money unless tragedy hit so hard they actually needed you, but what they needed most was you, and you were glad to share what you had with them because you were with them in whatever was befalling them. Where is any of that in TBN? Huh? And, when TBN was in its ascendancy and guys (flawed, warted guys ) like Hanegraaf were calling them on it 15 years or more ago, where was Charisma magazine then? Well, I'll tell you. They were doing cover stories in how wonderful Kenneth Hagin and Kenneth Copeland are, what wonderful ministry and the who's who of TBN is.
In 2005,
at this link, they did an article on Fred Price. Oh, they did lip service to those who disagree with Price's message, but they let him assert his poison without directly challenging it. It was like watching CNN "grilling" Obama.

So, for Charisma to now call for some sort of reform, well, it's just kind of laughable to me. And, even Grady's message stops short. You can't reform cancer. You kill it. Charismatic belief is a cancer. He doesn't recognize it that way. Instead, he offers,
Was it supposed to end like this? How did a movement that was at one time focused on winning people to Christ and introducing them to the power of the Holy Spirit end in such disgrace?
Really? Was that its focus? At what point on the merry go round did that focus get lost, sir? And, where have you been since that happened? For a guy who is putting himself front and center in some half-baked call for somber judgment
now, would he kindly do us all the service of pointing out what he's done to sound that alarm since this thing started? I mean, he's the one concerned about the supposed wayfaring message that had a good starting focus. To hear him tell it, it was all just "mistakes and weaknesses". Yeah. When will he admit that he's been part of the problem?? Far as I can tell, he still is. So, no, I'm not really impressed by his effort now.