Moderators: Pastor Gary, The J2 Mod Squad
bibleguy wrote:With their excellent track record, you just have to expect they'll do the right thing. I mean:
Adolf Hitler (1938)
Josef Stalin (1939 & 1942)
Nikita Kruschev (1957)
The entire twenty-five and under crowd (1966)
Richard Nixon (1971 & 1972 jointly with Kissinger in '72)
Deng Xiaoping (1978 & 1985)
Ayatullah Khomeini (1979)
"Endangered Earth" (1988)
"You" (2006)
Vladimir Putin (2007)
And just how far does their pendullum swing?
American Fighting-Man (1950)
Hungarian Freedom Fighter (1956)
The Peacemakers (1993) - No Christians need apply. They were talking about Yasser Arafat, F.W. de Klerk, Nelson Mandela and Yitzak Rabin. Thank God Mr. Arafat helped bring peace to the Middle East!
The American Soldier (2003)
bibleguy wrote:Didn't mean to imply that the South African guys were or weren't Christian. Only that when TIME says Peacemakers, and CHRIST says Peacemakers, they are not using the same criteria.
(I must, obviously, acknowledge that not all Christians are peacemakers, all too often it is the opposite.)
I also understand that it is not necessarily "good guy of the year," however, words mean things, and those words almost command that response in the reader. You have to overcome your initial attitude towards the words "Man of the Year" when you hear "And the winner is -- Josef Stalin."
That being said, I don't think Time saw Arafat as the bad guy that he was.
True, "MOST IMPACTFUL FIGURE OF THE YEAR..." doesn't look as good on a magazine cover.
As far as Mandela, I am not sure of his profession of faith, but singing about killing whites is not something one might find in a hymnal. I hope that, as a peacemaker, he made his peace with God.
MacUser wrote:hahaha -
Barack Obama stonewalls on Rod Blagojevich: “Don’t waste your question.”
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/toby_harnd ... r_question
First, Barack Obama gives himself and his staff a clean bill of health over the Rod Blagojevich scandal.
Second, he announces and then conducts a quick "internal inquiry" that he said - quel surprise! - had cleared everyone in Obamaland.
Third, he says that at the request of the US attorney's office he is delaying releasing the results of that inquiry until December 22nd, which, happily enough for him, is just before Christmas.
So what happens next? At today's Chicago press conference Obama flat refused to say anything about anything at all related to Blagogate, using the US attorney's request to delay release of the inquiry results as an excuse to decline any comment.
*****
As an ADDED Bonus from Chicagoland / Gotham.
Obama must have got to these people also? Notice the real link on the above story on the side... Yet this story disappeared?
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/toby_harnd ... _and_fast_
Return to “Jude 2 General Discussion Forum”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests