more archaeological site damage...
Posted: July 23rd, 2009, 10:31 am
http://www.cais-soas.com/news/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=54:a-large-parthian-site-in-khuzestan-province-seriously-damaged-a-partly-destroyed&catid=1
this is becoming more and more popularized in the news. we as a human-kind are progressing, and knowingly still choose to disregard ancient sites.
I assume that somewhere that there must be a line drawn, we would never be able to expand our boundaries if we didn't at some point begin to disregard other boundaries of time and historicity.
I am not one that is a proponent of stopping all progress, but I do believe that prior to that progress, there should be some examination of the past and the artifacts, etc. in order to at least quantify and qualify the "ruins" and perhaps even do what can be done for replication of the site, at the very least in the virtual/electronics, if not by model.
anyway - just wanted to rant a bit about this kind of thing again.
this is becoming more and more popularized in the news. we as a human-kind are progressing, and knowingly still choose to disregard ancient sites.
I assume that somewhere that there must be a line drawn, we would never be able to expand our boundaries if we didn't at some point begin to disregard other boundaries of time and historicity.
I am not one that is a proponent of stopping all progress, but I do believe that prior to that progress, there should be some examination of the past and the artifacts, etc. in order to at least quantify and qualify the "ruins" and perhaps even do what can be done for replication of the site, at the very least in the virtual/electronics, if not by model.
anyway - just wanted to rant a bit about this kind of thing again.