Page 1 of 9

Beach Day at Church

Posted: August 16th, 2009, 12:57 pm
by Susie Hamilton
We had a beach day at church this morning, everybody came wearing their beach attire, no swimsuits or speedos allowed. It was a wonderful service. This afternoon we had a baptism at the ocean front and had 13 new people baptised. The Pastor and Youth Pastor, in black tshirts, did the honors.

Posted: August 16th, 2009, 2:51 pm
by free
I love it...Wish I was there to see it!

Posted: August 17th, 2009, 1:23 pm
by Susie Hamilton
I have to admit, if someone had told me this 20 years ago I would not have believed it. Yesterday there were people getting baptised in their swimsuits and no one had a problem with it. It was awesome.

Posted: August 17th, 2009, 2:37 pm
by pastorables
Rahab wrote:I have to admit, if someone had told me this 20 years ago I would not have believed it. Yesterday there were people getting baptised in their swimsuits and no one had a problem with it. It was awesome.

Rahab wrote:no swimsuits or speedos allowed.


I rejoice with you concerning your service and wonderful results, but I am curious about the perceived contradiction in your posts?

God bless,
pa

I suspect

Posted: August 17th, 2009, 2:51 pm
by Pastor Gary
pastorables wrote:
Rahab wrote:I have to admit, if someone had told me this 20 years ago I would not have believed it. Yesterday there were people getting baptised in their swimsuits and no one had a problem with it. It was awesome.

Rahab wrote:no swimsuits or speedos allowed.


I rejoice with you concerning your service and wonderful results, but I am curious about the perceived contradiction in your posts?


I suspect that they wore something else for the service, and might have been BAPTIZED in swimsuits... at least I have seen that here.

With no intent to hurt...

Posted: August 18th, 2009, 4:02 am
by Poimen
You'll have to excuse me guys, but ...

That is down right shameful, even sacrilegious. :evil: :cry: :(

Posted: August 18th, 2009, 4:11 am
by DeWayneTN
What do you suppose the disciples were baptized in?

Re: With no intent to hurt...

Posted: August 18th, 2009, 4:12 am
by teach
Poimen wrote:You'll have to excuse me guys, but ...

That is down right shameful, even sacrilegious. :evil: :cry: :(


why?

Re: I suspect

Posted: August 18th, 2009, 4:14 am
by Susie Hamilton
Pastor Gary wrote:
pastorables wrote:
Rahab wrote:I have to admit, if someone had told me this 20 years ago I would not have believed it. Yesterday there were people getting baptised in their swimsuits and no one had a problem with it. It was awesome.

Rahab wrote:no swimsuits or speedos allowed.


I rejoice with you concerning your service and wonderful results, but I am curious about the perceived contradiction in your posts?


I suspect that they wore something else for the service, and might have been BAPTIZED in swimsuits... at least I have seen that here.


You are right PG. No swimsuits were allowed during the service at church. The baptism was later in the day and some of those people were enjoying an afternoon at the beach as well as being baptised.

Posted: August 18th, 2009, 5:37 am
by MacUser
Honestly.. They probably SHOULD have taken up an offering to BUY some cloths to cover some of them UP..


:lol: :lol:
*joking*

Re: With no intent to hurt...

Posted: August 18th, 2009, 5:57 am
by dalebert
Poimen wrote:You'll have to excuse me guys, but ...

That is down right shameful, even sacrilegious. :evil: :cry: :(


Not putting u down..but why would u feel this way? Just being curious....

Posted: August 18th, 2009, 9:06 am
by free
Poiman...You're joking right?

Posted: August 18th, 2009, 10:07 am
by oletimer
free Posted:

Poiman...You're joking right?


I don't think that he was joking and I'm not either. I don't think that the one doing the baptising should not have been exposed to that much flesh at least during service and other wise. In a world were any thing goes may be alright for some but not for a lot of us and surly not with God. Before everybody jumps on me this is my two cents and you have your. Now if you want to go into a discustion about it, then go to the "doctrine" and lets do it were can talk about it and leave the disscusion section as such.

BTW I mean no harm to anyone involved, just don't see it that way.

Hmmmmmm

Posted: August 18th, 2009, 10:15 am
by Pastor Gary
oletimer wrote:
free Posted:

Poiman...You're joking right?


I don't think that he was joking and I'm not either. I don't think that the one doing the baptising should not have been exposed to that much flesh at least during service and other wise. In a world were any thing goes may be alright for some but not for a lot of us and surly not with God. Before everybody jumps on me this is my two cents and you have your. Now if you want to go into a discustion about it, then go to the "doctrine" and lets do it were can talk about it and leave the disscusion section as such.

BTW I mean no harm to anyone involved, just don't see it that way.


I remember many years ago when one of our military chaplains had a revival break out on base, and U.S. Marines were being saved right and left. He baptized 20 or 30 of them in the Pacific Ocean and sent a photo in. which was printed in the White Wing Messenger. Did the WWM get tons of letters praising God for saving a bunch of Marines?

Nope. They got outraged calls/letters because the photo showed 30 bare-chested marines waist deep in the waters beaming with joy after baptism.

Re: Hmmmmmm

Posted: August 18th, 2009, 10:29 am
by MacUser
Pastor Gary wrote:Nope. They got outraged


Ouch. :?