Page 1 of 2

If your logic is sound

Posted: August 22nd, 2009, 8:40 am
by Brian
If some of your logic is sound and the ammount of clothing or lack thereof doesn't matter one bit then lets see 'em ladies and gentlemen, break out those juicy hot thong pics and the tiny weenie bikini shot! Lets go, put your money where your mouth is! lets see you christian married men start plastering your computers wallpaper with bikini shots of Paris Hilton and Britney Spears! WWWOOOOOOO WHoooooo!! I can't wait!!

Do I have the freedom to post a few examples here on Jude2 to prove my point? I bet I can find a nice selection of hard hot bodies like Dwayne "the Rock" Johnson, Matthew McConaughey, Jessia Alba, or Carmen Electra. I am sure my wife wouldn't mind at all if I put a hot sexy barely clothed Eva Mendes (she is soooo hot) :) yea, yea, i am suuuuuure she won't mind. :roll:

Posted: August 22nd, 2009, 8:49 am
by TW
Ask, and ye shall receive.

Image

I didn't post this to shock anybody, but only as a point of reference. These are actually quiet tame compared to some bikinis that I have seen at the beach.


TW

Posted: August 22nd, 2009, 9:16 am
by Brian
TW, are you going to tell me that there is NO difference in modesty between this pic and the one you posted?

Image

These women are actually more beautiful IMO because they ARE modest, which in turn makes them more appealing to me.

Posted: August 22nd, 2009, 10:34 am
by paul
Brian, No were in the baptism photo did you see anything like the photo TW posted. No were in the baptism photo did I see anyone posing, nor trying to look pervocative.

Just people at the beach some getting ready for baptism and some there to participate in the program.

I have baptize in the Ocean, Rivers, lake, streams, drainage ditches, Water Buffalo, snake infested swamps, rice paddies, horse watering troughs, swimming pools, baptistry's and bath tubs.

I have baptized men and women covered from head to toe in white garments, fully dressed in street clothes, shorts, swimming suits both single and two piece. I have baptizes ladies who were wearing cotton wraps with out anything under which is traditional. Then they held up a sheet between the men and women and they changed clothes. Did not bother me that was not what I was there for.

I have immersed them totally, I have had then kneel down and let the waves cover over them, I have sprinked one.

I can't believe all the fuss over the baptism photo. It in my opoinin was not inmodest at all.

Posted: August 22nd, 2009, 11:19 am
by TW
Brian wrote:TW, are you going to tell me that there is NO difference in modesty between this pic and the one you posted?


Brian I am not trying to tell you anything. You asked for pictures of tiny bikinis, and I posted one to establish a point of reference. Nothing more, nothing less.

These women are actually more beautiful IMO because they ARE modest, which in turn makes them more appealing to me.


As has been pointed out the term modesty is subjective and relative to the social and cultural norm. Modesty means dressing in a manner that does not draw attention to oneself. Both the Swedish Bikini Team and the two young ladies would fail the test for the term modest, because both draw attention. They simply fall on different ends of the spectrum.


TW

Not that far away...

Posted: August 22nd, 2009, 11:37 am
by Pastor Gary

Girls beach thongs

Posted: August 22nd, 2009, 12:11 pm
by Pastor Gary
Image

Posted: August 22nd, 2009, 12:17 pm
by beckrl
Come On guys your getting me in trouble with the pics :shock:

My wife looking over my shoulder asked me what I was looking at :roll:
I said the church forum :wink: She didn't believe me.

Pix

Posted: August 22nd, 2009, 1:13 pm
by Pastor Gary
beckrl wrote:Come On guys your getting me in trouble with the pics :shock:

My wife looking over my shoulder asked me what I was looking at :roll:
I said the church forum :wink: She didn't believe me.


I thought the Nemo thongs were cute.

Re: Pix

Posted: August 22nd, 2009, 1:34 pm
by beckrl
Pastor Gary wrote:
beckrl wrote:Come On guys your getting me in trouble with the pics :shock:

My wife looking over my shoulder asked me what I was looking at :roll:
I said the church forum :wink: She didn't believe me.


I thought the Nemo thongs were cute.


That's why I'm :oops:

try not to sin ye men

Posted: August 23rd, 2009, 4:34 am
by Full Quiver
My opinion is that in many cases men would wonder, lust, fantasize more often over a woman more clothed than one less clothed. The one with less leaves not much to the imagination.

Image

Posted: August 23rd, 2009, 5:49 am
by TW
FQ,
This is a case where I wish that they would leave more, a lot more, a whole lot more, to my imagination. PLEASE!


TW

*That's sick*

Posted: August 23rd, 2009, 8:18 am
by Russell Roberts
Full Quiver, that last pic was AWESOME!!! I'm breaking out in a cold sweat.

Posted: August 23rd, 2009, 8:37 am
by Russell Roberts
Brian wrote:TW, are you going to tell me that there is NO difference in modesty between this pic and the one you posted?

Image

These women are actually more beautiful IMO because they ARE modest, which in turn makes them more appealing to me.


So, Brian, which ones are you 'lusting' after more - the ones who are less clothed or more clothed?

Given your response, the less clothing, the less 'appealing' to you. You should go to a nude beach to avoid lust.

Posted: August 23rd, 2009, 9:36 am
by Full Quiver
Honestly the two girls with more clothes would probably satisfy more men's fancy and fantasy because truthfully we have a better chance with those girls than the Swedish chicks.