Jude 2

Posted: **August 24th, 2009, 1:21 pm**

Is this manner of dress Biblical or NOT Biblical? Why?

Posted: **August 24th, 2009, 1:30 pm**

my answer: n/a or perhaps "neither" is the better answer.

(now where is that picture of me in one of kilts...)

Daughters wedding, I am the one on the right, SIL second from the left.

Posted: **August 24th, 2009, 1:34 pm**

Nice legs RB, not too much hair. :lol:

Posted: **August 24th, 2009, 1:37 pm**

We Americans know that men wear pants and women wear skirts, don't they? Someone is sure to use Deuteronomy 22:5 (King James Version)
"The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman's garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the LORD thy God." to "prove" that men wearing kilts (or polynesian lava-lavas) is unholy.

Posted: **August 24th, 2009, 1:38 pm**

Biblical. We are NOT UNDER THE TORAH. Never have been, aren't, and never will be. Besides, my guess is that it is a man's garment in that culture.

Posted: **August 24th, 2009, 1:52 pm**

Russell Roberts wrote:...my guess is that it is a man's garment in that culture.

No, Russell. If we have learned anything from this thread it is that anything in the Bible is to be equally applied to all people, in all time and cultures, and we can't appeal to cultural appropriateness as a defense. :wink:

Posted: **August 24th, 2009, 1:56 pm**

Well, I had a 50/50 chance. Figgered I'd take a stab at it.

Better luck next time maybe.

Posted: **August 24th, 2009, 1:59 pm**

RamboPreacher wrote:my answer: n/a or perhaps "neither" is the better answer.

(now where is that picture of me in one of kilts...)

Daughters wedding, I am the one on the right, SIL second from the left.

I'm the one laughing in the 3rd row....4th from the right. ;p

...

Posted: **August 24th, 2009, 2:02 pm**

RaceRunner wrote:
etc...

that was very "Christian" (not) of you to laugh at me/us, and at a very holy ceremony of wedding vows, to boot. wow. just wow. :roll:

Posted: **August 24th, 2009, 2:02 pm**

RaceRunner wrote::lol:

I'm the one laughing in the 3rd row....4th from the right. ;p

What is funny about men in kilts?

Posted: **August 24th, 2009, 2:11 pm**

Pastor Gary wrote:

Is this manner of dress Biblical or NOT Biblical? Why?

If you are going to quote Deuteronomy in this case....ignoring the true meaning of that particular scripture...probably very Biblical....since Men & Women both wore "dresses" in Bible. :lol:

Although I've seen women wear skirts as ugly as those....they are modest. ;P :lol:

Now if they cut off a foot or so of fabric, giving the public glimpses of higher regions when they bend over....I would have to say no.

:lol:

Posted: **August 24th, 2009, 2:12 pm**

Pastor Gary wrote:
RaceRunner wrote::lol:

I'm the one laughing in the 3rd row....4th from the right. ;p

What is funny about men in kilts?

I wasn't laughing at MEN in kilts.

I was laughing at Rambo in a kilt.

hahahahahhahhahahha!

Sorry Rambo......hahhahahhaha...

Posted: **August 24th, 2009, 2:13 pm**

Pastor Gary wrote:We Americans know that men wear pants and women wear skirts, don't they? Someone is sure to use Deuteronomy 22:5 (King James Version)
"The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman's garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the LORD thy God." to "prove" that men wearing kilts (or polynesian lava-lavas) is unholy.

You bet me posting that scripture :lol:

Posted: **August 24th, 2009, 2:14 pm**

RamboPreacher wrote:
RaceRunner wrote:
etc...
that was very "Christian" (not) of you to laugh at me/us, and at a very holy ceremony of wedding vows, to boot. wow. just wow.

poor baby. :lol: