Page 1 of 1

Well I am interested now because of the other thread

Posted: October 6th, 2009, 11:01 pm
by one love
who do you think is more electable and a better option as president?

Posted: October 7th, 2009, 1:27 am
by Billy n NC
thats not fair.

thats my wish ticket.. either way..

But Huckabee may be more votable.


I think that is why he is on fox. for more people will get to know him.

never heard of him during the election.

Posted: October 7th, 2009, 2:40 am
by dawgs10
no doubt he would be a better pres. he is also someone that would not abanden the working person for wall street.

I would

Posted: October 7th, 2009, 5:31 am
by scooter
I would be very interested to see Palin in a primary agianst the others in the field.

IMHO Palin ingnited the republican base which is a conservative bubble. She was the only reason I felt any urge to vote in this last election. I'm not alone, it's a good size bubble.

I have not bought into the tinafeyzation of Palin. I think she brings common sense to the table which IMHO means more than being able to speak fluent political Harvard hogwash.

In truth I've thought Romney would have probably been the best choice for the office, if things were just about the economy.

The internet, talk radio, and cable tv have begun to put a dent into the wickedness of Washington's corruption.

To me Sarah Palin represents a breath of fresh air.

I do understand how that if one has limited themselves to CNN, The NYT or local liberal press, and Saturday Night Live how that Palin would look stupid.

I believe that there is a bubble bursting grass roots conservative mass that has yet to engage in elections.

Posted: October 7th, 2009, 5:44 am
by DeWayneTN
Right, Scooter. I think there's a significant portion of disenfranchised voters that can be energized.

Posted: October 7th, 2009, 5:51 am
by scooter
DeWayneTN wrote:Right, Scooter. I think there's a significant portion of disenfranchised voters that can be energized.


Response: That's exactly how Obama got elected.

Posted: October 7th, 2009, 6:17 am
by Shellie
Besides all the reasons scooter gave, he thinks she's pretty. :D

Re: I would

Posted: October 7th, 2009, 8:08 am
by macgulley
scooter wrote:I would be very interested to see Palin in a primary agianst the others in the field.

IMHO Palin ingnited the republican base which is a conservative bubble. She was the only reason I felt any urge to vote in this last election. I'm not alone, it's a good size bubble.

I have not bought into the tinafeyzation of Palin. I think she brings common sense to the table which IMHO means more than being able to speak fluent political Harvard hogwash.

In truth I've thought Romney would have probably been the best choice for the office, if things were just about the economy.

The internet, talk radio, and cable tv have begun to put a dent into the wickedness of Washington's corruption.

To me Sarah Palin represents a breath of fresh air.

I do understand how that if one has limited themselves to CNN, The NYT or local liberal press, and Saturday Night Live how that Palin would look stupid.

I believe that there is a bubble bursting grass roots conservative mass that has yet to engage in elections.


You said it better than I could have.

Posted: October 7th, 2009, 9:41 am
by Full Quiver
he is also someone that would not abanden the working person for wall street.


Is this a general statement about Huckabee or a slam towards someone else? Honest question Dawgs.