A theory
Posted: November 19th, 2009, 3:45 am
OKay, so there is no sensible reason to try the terrorists in a public court.
Here's the reasons....
1. Most if not all were not read their rights such as the right to remain silent, the right to an attorney, etc.
2. Most did not have attorney's for years
3. The Constitution guarantees citizens the right to a speedy and fair trial. These guys have been locked up for years without trial and there is no chance of a fair trial because EVERYONE knows who these cats are and what they did.
4. The possibility of the city and court room becoming a terror target greatly increases.
5. Some liberal judge throws the case out and the killers walk free right out into NYC.
So why on Earth would Holder and Obama do this (even though Obama stood as a Senator against such)?
My theory is that since these guys killed civilians they are being tried in a public court. (Holder said that much). They want to make a precedence with this which would allow for our folks who may have killed civilians abroad to be tried in courts abroad. Make sense?
In other words if Iraq said Bush killed innocent civilians by ordering air raid such and such then we want to try him in our courts and we will use your own precedence as our back up.
Here's the reasons....
1. Most if not all were not read their rights such as the right to remain silent, the right to an attorney, etc.
2. Most did not have attorney's for years
3. The Constitution guarantees citizens the right to a speedy and fair trial. These guys have been locked up for years without trial and there is no chance of a fair trial because EVERYONE knows who these cats are and what they did.
4. The possibility of the city and court room becoming a terror target greatly increases.
5. Some liberal judge throws the case out and the killers walk free right out into NYC.
So why on Earth would Holder and Obama do this (even though Obama stood as a Senator against such)?
My theory is that since these guys killed civilians they are being tried in a public court. (Holder said that much). They want to make a precedence with this which would allow for our folks who may have killed civilians abroad to be tried in courts abroad. Make sense?
In other words if Iraq said Bush killed innocent civilians by ordering air raid such and such then we want to try him in our courts and we will use your own precedence as our back up.