dolfan wrote:But, everybody's gotta be somewhere, Rambo. What do you all think about the likelihood of near to medium term pressures making a shift in meeting places or meeting methods likely?
the relevancy is already changed, not because of gubbamint mandate, but for other reasons. I can only guess based on regional worldviews.
i think that at least around here, we hav elost the sense of the "mission". i don't meant that in the sens of the typical understanding of what a mission is or mission outreach. rather, in a more theological-historic context.
the catholic church of the first centuries, had an idea that I think we think is happening, but I don't think is relevant. let me explain a bit with how I understand that worldview from the 4-about the 6th centuries of the work of the mission. they didn't take their language, culture and biased worldview to the field and expect them to conform to that.
Instead, they would take Jesus to them. they would go to the field (read as; another country, state, city, neighborhood). live a Christian life as best they could and learn the cultures and philosophy's and their bias and worldviews and then introduce Christ to them in a way that is real, relevant and with emphasis on transformation, rather than ritual.
there was no watering of the Gospel, or compromise, it was "translated". Christianity has no privileged language. it has always been and should always be a translated belief/tradition/religion. What I am saying is that when we expect "the world" to conform to what we interpret as "church", it may happen - I do not doubt God's power and the Holy Spirit leading.
I guess that for me, I see it more about adapting what we think as "going to church", and making it relevant to those that need the church in their life. no, the church isn't going to bring salvation, but my ecclesiolgy has soteriology and ecclesiology linked in some ways.
I have hinted at this in the doctrine thread about seeker churches and where the line is to be drawn at the negative context when there is no definitive line of heresy.
Our protestant understanding of the church has taken us so far away from being the church into something that is particular and specific. we don't talk about the church any more, we talk about our church, their church, and churches. look in the yellow pages under church, and then ask yourself how the "outsider" sees us? is it a unity? one body of Christ?
John 17th chapter gives them permission to judge us based on that unity as to whether we are in Christ, and therefor from God or not. that sanctification and unity are outward expressions that the so that "...the world may believe that You sent Me." (vs21)
anyway, rambling now...
I guess all that to say that I don't think it matters where we worship Him. it matters more that we worship Him. and YES, I do believe that it should be in fellowship, and not just familial extremities. home churches, meting at the local hotel meeting rooms, a special building designated as church, wherever. I think we place too much emphasis on edifice, and not enough on the church.