Postby Rob » October 1st, 2007, 4:38 am
Paully_44 wrote:Pastor Rob wrote:Okay,
Here's my thoughts:
First USC was not impressive or Washington is better than I thought they were.
You are right. USC is nothing more than an overated team that plays in a weak conference, (

) behind the SEC, Big-10, Big East, Indies, WAC and anyother conference......that is why they 7 of their defense players are ranked in the top 50 college players. UW is good, but in a rebuilding year (again) USC is banged up and playing with many subs. but then, how many outside of the PAC-10 cares or even care that they are defending Natl Champs 2 years running now and possibly will make it a third.
Best game of the weekened? Notre Lame, 0-5!
Could Hawaii be the BSU of 2007? Most definately
Paully, what is your problem? I said nothing about USC being overrated. Said nothing about the PAC-10 or any other conference in my post.
Who ranked those players on Defense? Everyone is an All-American on paper.
So USC is banged up, could be why in my opinion they played so unimpressive to be the then #1 team in the nation.
FYI, Paully, I'm a college football fan, I am a fan of the game, not necessarily a conference. I love to watch a good game, regardless of who is playing. I have stated on here the only two teams I really dislike is ND and UL, otherwise I watch, don't root for a team unless it's WVU or UK.
Paully since the beginning of the BCS USC has only 1, NC. I'm sure you are probably counting the one the AP gave to USC and BCS was LSU. But as a true football fan, how can you recognize the AP? That's why the BCS was started to keep from having split NC.
If I were to read, much less answer, all the attacks made on me, this shop might as well be closed for business. I do the very best I know how, the very best I can, and I mean to keep doing so until the end. If the end brings me out right, what is said against me won't amount to anything. If the end brings me out wrong, ten angels swearing I was right will make no difference." -Abraham Lincoln