Postby dolfan » June 2nd, 2009, 4:01 am
You're both right. Mac, I'd go one step back in time, even, and say that many of our parents trusted the public schools to teach their children what they had been taught -- traditional limited government civics, for example. Our parents went to sleep at the wheel. Today, they're too busy texting behind it, or just leaving it up to someone else "in the village" to drive their children's futures.
I want to share an example, by way of analogy, that demonstrates the truth of Jesus' observation that the children of the world are, in their generation, wiser than the children of light. Michael Moore wrote a blabbering diatribe about how the government should reconstitute GM as the union-hiring arm of transportation devoted to high speed light rail, a sort of "rail here, rail now" demand. Now, while I agree that high speed light rail is a fabulous idea, my agreement with Moore goes no further. Whoever is right, let's say that government takes on this idea that mass transit, however it is done, is the way of the future. The societal impact of that is immeasurable. One simple question shows this to be so: Will you have the right to have an open bible in a light rail car as you do in your own automobile now?
It isn't farfetched, is it, to think that government would forbid that? What with the new government intrusion into private homes to forbid Christians meeting (if it were gays meeting to plan a parade, they'd get a city grant), and now the Pa. decision to stop a kindergartner from sharing his bible verses in show and tell, you'd almost have to assume that no bibles or other Christian expressions would be allowed in mass transit/light rail.
How's all this add up to being "wise"? Well, here's the rule: Train up a child in the way that he should go and when he matures, he'll hold to that way. Right? Create, control and maintain the environment where your children learn how to live. We lack the patience and the vision of the future to unplug from the "grid" and live with dependence on each other as believers.
It is, (IMO, which won't get you a cup of coffee) more likely than not true that in order to do that, a wholesale abandonment of all of the civil structures of government are required. Half-measures won't do. Government schools, government processes for the vindication of rights and liberties, government participation --- all of it, I do believe, has to be rejected in favor of another way of ordering Christians' lives that is radically different and even opposed to the way we now do that.
The immediate objection is always, "Well, you can't separate yourselves from the whole world. It is impossible and hurts the witness of the church." Oh, really? As opposed to a failed and hopelessly misguided effort to be effective within the order of the world? As opposed to, say, not hurting the witness of the church by buying into a corrupt system that encourages our divorces, sexualizes our children, encourages amusement over equipping, substitutes virtues such as industry, charity and honesty with "virtues" such as redistribution of wealth, diversity, "tolerance" (so-called, unless you are Christian, of course), rewards consumption with endless credit and inflation and punishes saving wealth with taxation, and which convinces the church of Jesus that a corrupt order is a suitable surrogate for meeting the demands of the gospel to feed the hungry, clothe the poor, visit the prisoners, relieve the oppressed, etc. --- in other words, has totally removed the American church from the mission to which God has called the church worldwide??
There is nothing holding the church back from being the church. If you believe in a dispensationalist view of things (and I don't, but that's beside the point here) and you take seriously the view that after a rapture the Holy Spirit's withdrawal from earth will remove all restraint of evil, then you ought to equally believe and pursue conduct that says, in essence, while He is here and active through the church, the church will do what it did when it turned the world upside down ---- and that existence was underground, my friends. House churches. Secret meetings, as may be required, where people are serious about living the Jesus kind of life through His power and Spirit and by His word, not where they are entertained by it. A way where living has both the power and form of godliness. No big money shakedowns, but instead a simple devotion between small familial groupings to meet each others' real and material needs but where everybody works as much as possible in order to be able to meet them.
If you don't believe in a dispensational view, and you believe that the kingdom of Christ already is at work in this world and that His kindgom not only shall reign forever, but reigns now in this age, then what greater witness is there than this kind of life? How many are being truly won to a sacrificial life of humility, giving, devotedness to the people around you, all of these things in the way of Jesus --- how many are being won to it by the American model as it now exists? How long will this model continue without necessary recourse to the very institutions of government and society that oppose the church's essential, core purposes? I don't see how things are sustainable as they are. I just don't.
Human government bears the same relation to hell as the church bears to heaven. (David Lipscomb, On Civil Government, 72).