tax info

A free-wheeling forum for discussion of Christian issues.

Moderators: Pastor Gary, The J2 Mod Squad

valley
Ranking in the posts...
Ranking in the posts...
Posts: 291
Joined: January 28th, 2007, 8:48 am
Location: USA,Georgia

Postby valley » May 11th, 2008, 7:40 am

dbserv wrote:On the flip side, I wonder what Jesus would say??????????????

After all, He did say to pay to Caeser what was Caeser's. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm ???????????????????????????????


True, but what does that have to do with Uncle Sam? :lol:

I support either a flat tax or the fair tax (with certain changes). Think of it, a tax plan that is 10% of the income, with a $15,000 per member of a household that is tax exempt. For example:

If a family of four made 75,000, their total taxible income would be $15,000 or a total income tax of $1500.

Business taxes could work the same: 10% of the profits is to be taxed, or tax them as a C-corp (i believe that is correct), which will pass the tax burdon to the owners as income. The business would then give the owners check to pay the taxes.

Also, close the loopholes that allow higher income individuals to place their money in tax shelters, if it is possible.

Or for that matter, a fair tax that exempts certain necessities and does away with the rebates.

dbserv
Hey, hey, hey
Posts: 1570
Joined: January 29th, 2003, 7:23 pm
Location: USA,California
Contact:

Postby dbserv » May 11th, 2008, 8:11 am

valley wrote:
dbserv wrote:On the flip side, I wonder what Jesus would say??????????????

After all, He did say to pay to Caeser what was Caeser's. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm ???????????????????????????????


True, but what does that have to do with Uncle Sam? :lol:



Well, Caeser was the govt. of Jesus' day in his part of the world and collected the taxes.


"Uncle Sam" is the govt. of our day in our part of the world and collects the taxes.



I, too favor a flat tax. If I recall correctly, Steve Forbes said that a 10% rate would provide all of our needs as a country.
God Bless You

Dan Bagley

User avatar
TW
Established Member
Posts: 8866
Joined: November 4th, 2004, 3:38 pm
Location: USA,Georgia
Contact:

Postby TW » May 11th, 2008, 9:07 am

I said it before, and I'll say it again!

10% - NO LOOPHOLES - everybody; private citizens, companies, and corporations.

ABOLISH WELFARE (as we know it)! If a person is physically able to work, they don't qualify for welfare. It won't take very long for them to find a job, and put an illegal alien out of work and going home.


TW
Anglo-Saxon Proto-English Manuscripts (995 AD): “God lufode middan-eard swa, dat he seade his an-cennedan sunu, dat nan ne forweorde de on hine gely ac habbe dat ece lif."

My blog - http://theoldman.wordpress.com/

DaJudge
-= J2 =-
Posts: 4477
Joined: June 10th, 2004, 3:33 am
Location: USA,Georgia

Postby DaJudge » May 11th, 2008, 9:23 am

dbserv wrote:

On the flip side, I wonder what Jesus would say??????????????

After all, He did say to pay to Caeser what was Caeser's. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm ???????????????????????????????


He'd say, "I'm gonna have to catch a whole bunch of fish to get enough money out of their mouths to pay these taxes."

dbserv
Hey, hey, hey
Posts: 1570
Joined: January 29th, 2003, 7:23 pm
Location: USA,California
Contact:

Postby dbserv » May 11th, 2008, 9:43 am

TW wrote:I said it before, and I'll say it again!

10% - NO LOOPHOLES - everybody; private citizens, companies, and corporations.

ABOLISH WELFARE (as we know it)! If a person is physically able to work, they don't qualify for welfare. It won't take very long for them to find a job, and put an illegal alien out of work and going home.


TW



I'm with you ALL the way!!!


If we're paying them anyway, why can't they do road work, clean the parks, etc.

Although, the Governator tried some of that and the public employee unions put up a HUGE stink and got it defeated. They are WAAAAAAAAAAAAAY too powerful. Arnie should have taken it to the streets and he might have won.


Maybe next time.
God Bless You



Dan Bagley

one love
Woohoo!
Posts: 3082
Joined: October 23rd, 2007, 12:48 pm
Location: USA,Virginia

Postby one love » May 11th, 2008, 9:44 am

we do render unto "ceaser" but christ never mentioned anything regarding the amount they charge, as long as it is law we pay . So that reference is not right at all, unless I said I refuse to pay taxes.

Fairtax is the way to go, it works for everyone.

dbserv
Hey, hey, hey
Posts: 1570
Joined: January 29th, 2003, 7:23 pm
Location: USA,California
Contact:

Postby dbserv » May 11th, 2008, 3:53 pm

Since taxes in His time were most likely WAY higher than now, we should probably pay what is required until we can get it changed through legislation or revolution. :o
God Bless You



Dan Bagley

User avatar
Jennifer Smith
Moderator
Posts: 3745
Joined: June 23rd, 2003, 11:40 am
Location: USA,Indiana

Postby Jennifer Smith » May 11th, 2008, 4:00 pm

TW wrote:
Jennifer Smith wrote:Haven't you ever heard of Robin Hood? :lol:


Jennifer,
Following that logic, it removes all incentives to be financially successful. What is the point of working hard to gain financially when the government (Robin Hood? Yeah, right!) is going to steal it from you and give it to a bunch of people that are too lazy to work for their own money? Our tax system penalizes the successful and rewards the slacker.


TW


I understand, it was only tongue-in-cheek. :)

I do think it is unfair to tax the wealthy so heavily. On the other hand, I do not agree with an across the board tax either!
..I press on to take hold of that
for which Christ took hold of me.
-Phil 3:12

User avatar
TW
Established Member
Posts: 8866
Joined: November 4th, 2004, 3:38 pm
Location: USA,Georgia
Contact:

Postby TW » May 11th, 2008, 4:12 pm

Jennifer Smith wrote:
TW wrote:
Jennifer Smith wrote:Haven't you ever heard of Robin Hood? :lol:


Jennifer,
Following that logic, it removes all incentives to be financially successful. What is the point of working hard to gain financially when the government (Robin Hood? Yeah, right!) is going to steal it from you and give it to a bunch of people that are too lazy to work for their own money? Our tax system penalizes the successful and rewards the slacker.


TW


I understand, it was only tongue-in-cheek. :)

I do think it is unfair to tax the wealthy so heavily. On the other hand, I do not agree with an across the board tax either!


Could I ask why? Please explain your reasoning on this. It seems to me that if God did not have a sliding scale for tithes, and required 10% from everybody, then the government could function well with their 10%.


TW
Last edited by TW on May 11th, 2008, 4:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Anglo-Saxon Proto-English Manuscripts (995 AD): “God lufode middan-eard swa, dat he seade his an-cennedan sunu, dat nan ne forweorde de on hine gely ac habbe dat ece lif."



My blog - http://theoldman.wordpress.com/

User avatar
oletimer
Da Bomb!
Posts: 919
Joined: December 5th, 2007, 5:04 pm
Location: USA,Alabama

Postby oletimer » May 11th, 2008, 4:14 pm

Jennifer Smith Posted:

TW wrote:
Jennifer Smith wrote:
Haven't you ever heard of Robin Hood?



Jennifer,
Following that logic, it removes all incentives to be financially successful. What is the point of working hard to gain financially when the government (Robin Hood? Yeah, right!) is going to steal it from you and give it to a bunch of people that are too lazy to work for their own money? Our tax system penalizes the successful and rewards the slacker.


TW


I understand, it was only tongue-in-cheek.

I do think it is unfair to tax the wealthy so heavily. On the other hand, I do not agree with an across the board tax either!


Jennifer, most wealthy pay less then most of the rest of us. They can afford to pay for their loop holes. Too many times they don't pay any thing. Not against the rich, as I need their work.
God Bless

User avatar
TW
Established Member
Posts: 8866
Joined: November 4th, 2004, 3:38 pm
Location: USA,Georgia
Contact:

Postby TW » May 11th, 2008, 4:32 pm

oletimer wrote:Jennifer, most wealthy pay less then most of the rest of us. They can afford to pay for their loop holes. Too many times they don't pay any thing. Not against the rich, as I need their work.


Can you site verifiable statistical data for this? According to IRS data the top 5% of tax payers paid almost 60% of the tax burden, while the bottom 50% of tax payers accounted for only 3% of the taxes paid. This tends to disprove your theory.


TW
Anglo-Saxon Proto-English Manuscripts (995 AD): “God lufode middan-eard swa, dat he seade his an-cennedan sunu, dat nan ne forweorde de on hine gely ac habbe dat ece lif."



My blog - http://theoldman.wordpress.com/

User avatar
oletimer
Da Bomb!
Posts: 919
Joined: December 5th, 2007, 5:04 pm
Location: USA,Alabama

Postby oletimer » May 11th, 2008, 5:09 pm

TW Posted:

Can you site verifiable statistical data for this? According to IRS data the top 5% of tax payers paid almost 60% of the tax burden, while the bottom 50% of tax payers accounted for only 3% of the taxes paid. This tends to disprove your theory.


No I can't site verifiable satistical data for this, Most is hear say. At this time all I have is your word for your point. Not that I'm doubting you, but as you ask for proof of me how about giving it your self. Thanks
God Bless

one love
Woohoo!
Posts: 3082
Joined: October 23rd, 2007, 12:48 pm
Location: USA,Virginia

Postby one love » May 11th, 2008, 6:45 pm

dbserv wrote:Since taxes in His time were most likely WAY higher than now, we should probably pay what is required until we can get it changed through legislation or revolution. :o


that was my point, so long as it is law we have to pay :wink:

one love
Woohoo!
Posts: 3082
Joined: October 23rd, 2007, 12:48 pm
Location: USA,Virginia

Postby one love » May 11th, 2008, 6:48 pm

oletimer wrote:
Jennifer Smith Posted:

TW wrote:
Jennifer Smith wrote:
Haven't you ever heard of Robin Hood?



Jennifer,
Following that logic, it removes all incentives to be financially successful. What is the point of working hard to gain financially when the government (Robin Hood? Yeah, right!) is going to steal it from you and give it to a bunch of people that are too lazy to work for their own money? Our tax system penalizes the successful and rewards the slacker.


TW


I understand, it was only tongue-in-cheek.

I do think it is unfair to tax the wealthy so heavily. On the other hand, I do not agree with an across the board tax either!


Jennifer, most wealthy pay less then most of the rest of us. They can afford to pay for their loop holes. Too many times they don't pay any thing. Not against the rich, as I need their work.



ummmmm please see my reference chart they pay most of all taxes in the U.S. the top 1 percent earners pay almost all the taxes 39 percent of people pay no taxes that work.

one love
Woohoo!
Posts: 3082
Joined: October 23rd, 2007, 12:48 pm
Location: USA,Virginia

Postby one love » May 11th, 2008, 6:51 pm

Not sure if anyone read the first post i made on this thread which started this but here is the figures


The U.S. tax system is highly progressive. The top 1 percent of income earners, by household, paid 39 percent of all federal income taxes in 2005, whereas the bottom 50 percent paid a little over 3 percent. Further, 32 percent of all tax returns filed in 2005 were from people who paid no federal income tax at all.


Return to “Jude 2 General Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests

Login  •  Register