GREAT NEWS! GREAT NEWS!!!!!!

[EagerBeaver]

So would you have stated that Jesus was was acting in the flesh when he called the religious leaders vipers? Was Jesus acting in the flesh when he was angered by what people had turned the temple into and turned over tables.

Did I slip into yiddish or something? You haven't answered my question.

Not Yiddish but German. This is how your question looked to me.

So würden Sie erklärt haben, dass Jesus fungierte im Fleisch war, als er die religiösen Führer Vipern anrief? Zu war Jesus, der im fungiert Fleisch, als er verärgert wurde von, welchen Leuten den Tempel und umgedreht Tabellen gemacht hatte.

Looked like Greek to me!

Έτσι θα είχατε δηλώσει ότι ο Ιησούς ήταν ενεργούσε αυτοπροσώπως πότε κάλεσε τις θρησκευτικές οχιές ηγετών; Ήταν ο Ιησούς που ενεργεί αυτοπροσώπως όταν θυμώθηκε από ποιους ανθρώπους είχε γυρίσει το ναό και τους αναποδογυρισμένους πίνακες.

My friend Hiro says it looks like Japanese to him!!! Sorry Windows users.

従って彼が宗教指導者を毒蛇と電話する前にイエス・キリストが機能していた直接あったことを示そうか。 どんな人々に寺院を引っくり返されるテーブルを回したか彼がによって怒らせられたときに直接行動しているイエス・キリストはあり。

[MrDanger]

BTW, I don't think your previous comparison bears out, and that is all I can say about that.

Okay what am I missing.

You are saying that what Gerald does is in the flesh.

Gerald calls people snakes and vipers and hypocrits.

So did Jesus.

You say the way Gerald treats others by discounting their religious activities is in the flesh.

So did Jesus.

How does that comparison not work. I even added where Jesus was sarcastic. I don't know how you could read Jesus' comments any other way. The people he was speaking to were Hebrew. Do you really read Jesus' comments and believe Jesus didn't think these Hebrews had not heard of King David. Especially since they could not have reached their position without memorizing the entire OT. Jesus was mocking them.

[scooter]

Love you all

[Jennifer Smith]

BTW, I don't think your previous comparison bears out, and that is all I can say about that.

Okay what am I missing.

You are saying that what Gerald does is in the flesh.

Gerald calls people snakes and vipers and hypocrits.

So did Jesus.

You say the way Gerald treats others by discounting their religious activities is in the flesh.

So did Jesus.

How does that comparison not work. I even added where Jesus was sarcastic. I don't know how you could read Jesus' comments any other way. The people he was speaking to were Hebrew. Do you really read Jesus' comments and believe Jesus didn't think these Hebrews had not heard of King David. Especially since they could not have reached their position without memorizing the entire OT. Jesus was mocking them.

See reply in "Just curious" thread.

Btw, I was hurt by the comparison because in that scenario, myself and others would be the "vipers"- we are the ones that Gerald is lashing out at.

[THE RAzEr]

Just wondering if the dead people Todd saw like the ones the Disciples saw on the mount of Transfiguration, or are they more like the ones John sawstanging around the throne rejoicing, or more like the deaed small , or more like the ones who had dead in Rev.6 for the cause who woke up and spoke.

Still I do not support Bentley just because there were people in the New Testament who saw dead people.

Ray

Most of your posts to me are the verbal equivalent of a John Wayne Gacy Clown Photo.

This one I was able to decipher.

Perhaps you should study up on the PERSON whom he saw and the situation in which he saw them.

I think you understnd my posts.

You have not answered my challenge. If you are Born Again and really concerned. Go Stop the deceitful chalitan trickery. According to the article you posted, Branham could "do nothing" in the presence of Born Again believers. Bentley, according to you, is in direct line from Branham. Prove the theories of those you uphold.


Ray

[MrDanger]

Btw, I was hurt by the comparison because in that scenario, myself and others would be the "vipers"- we are the ones that Gerald is lashing out at.

Don't take this the wrong way, but I'm not surprised. You have searched before to find things to be offended by what I have said. Typically, it's a misunderstanding.

And that is the case once again.

No. The comparison is to those that teach things against the Bible. Do you teach heresy? Does your husband? If so, then yes, you fit the comparison. If you don't, then you don't fit the comparison.

Do I believe you trust in false teachers, YES!!!! And what's sad to me is you are way to smart for that. But I don't judge you....like you, I have been deceived by some of these guys. The more I have studied the teachings of Jesus, the more I realized almost all the jokers on TBN are the vipers Jesus talked about.

[justsam]

Don't take this the wrong way, but I'm not surprised. You have searched before to find things to be offended by what I have said. Typically, it's a misunderstanding.

Or maybe you're being a jerk.

Sam Smith

[Shellie]

Or maybe you're being a jerk.

Not to be confused with jerkin' under the spirit which is okay.

[one love]

why is it that people can not discuss things with out insulting others and calling them names. Gerald cant be blamed here .......


Look dont be so hard on one another Jennifer is just giving her view, if you dont agree , fine get over it. Second responding back calling Mr Danger a jerk is out of order. If Im wrong forgive me but I think jennifer has been nice about this and I disagree with some of the things said yet niether of us had to insult each other. I dont get....

Where i come from some of this is "fighting words"

[Gerald Creasy]

why is it that people can not discuss things with out insulting others and calling them names. Gerald cant be blamed here .......


Look dont be so hard on one another Jennifer is just giving her view, if you dont agree , fine get over it. Second responding back calling Mr Danger a jerk is out of order. If Im wrong forgive me but I think jennifer has been nice about this and I disagree with some of the things said yet niether of us had to insult each other. I dont get....

Where i come from some of this is "fighting words"

Jennifer is facing opposition; hubby has to respond.

It has moved into "how dare you contradict my wife!"

Yet another Pentecostal Apologetic tactic.

(just watch. If I keep dialoging with razer...there'll be Ammons crawlin outa the wood work that haven't been seen in a coons age)

[pastorables]

Why should you NOT be challenged when discussing scripture?

I don't mind being challenged by the Word. I do not enjoy having my scriptures overlooked, which happens often in our discussions.

The angel thing is just not that important, IMO. You continue to cry aloud and spare not and I will continue to engage you on the not so important points.

[Jennifer Smith]

why is it that people can not discuss things with out insulting others and calling them names. Gerald cant be blamed here .......


Look dont be so hard on one another Jennifer is just giving her view, if you dont agree , fine get over it. Second responding back calling Mr Danger a jerk is out of order. If Im wrong forgive me but I think jennifer has been nice about this and I disagree with some of the things said yet niether of us had to insult each other. I dont get....

Where i come from some of this is "fighting words"

Jennifer is facing opposition; hubby has to respond.

'

Yes, Sam is my husband.. and I think he was trying to temper his response. Mr. Danger was being obtuse. I think Sam just meant to point that out.

[Gerald Creasy]

The angel thing is just not that important, IMO. You continue to cry aloud and spare not and I will continue to engage you on the not so important points.

Pastor Ables, I apologize and will try to consider your scripture references in relation to our discussions.


I would encourage you, however to read up on Christian gnosticism. I believe you will find similarities to current pentecostalism. Well lat least Two: Angels and denying the God incarnate aspect of Jesus.

[Sherry]

I'm thinking I need to break out the cheese.....



for all this "whining!!'

[pastorables]

Pastor Ables, I apologize and will try to consider your scripture references in relation to our discussions.

No need for apologies, but I appreciate your gentleman's etiquette. I enjoy our discussions.

I would encourage you, however to read up on Christian gnosticism. I believe you will find similarities to current pentecostalism. Well lat least Two: Angels and denying the God incarnate aspect of Jesus.

Thanks. I understand that current Pentecostalism is far from our roots, but so is the Methodist church far from their roots, and so on.... Show me a perfectly balanced, Bible believing, empowered church.... oh wait... that's where I attend, Cross Pointe.