N.T. Wright Fan wrote: For a while now, I have toyed with the idea of writing a book exploring the idea of the American Pharisee.
Given that the Pharisees were a quasi-political faction within Judaism in the first and early second century, it would be difficult to say exactly what the modern-day equivalent would be.
The Pharisees were not quasi-political, they were full-on political. In the absense of a king, the Sanhedrin ran Israel without challenge until Rome invaded, and the Pharisees were the Sanhedrin. In a theocracy, and Israel was a theocracy, there is no question of separating church and state, so they had no trouble with troublesome interference with their decisions on how the state would be run, at least they didn't until Rome took over and established an hereditary royalty, the Herod family. The Pharisees, however, made it obvious to the Herodian Tetrachs that they would have a lot more cooperation and revenue if they paid attention when the Sanhedrin spoke.
N.T. Wright Fan wrote:However, since the Pharisees were the group with which Jesus dealt most harshly, it seems to me that it might be helpful to ask the question: What would an American Pharisee look like? The so-called Religious Right? Tee-Totalers? Democrats? Republicans? Or what? And why?
They would look like Congress, aka the Millionaire's Club, in really weird robes and hats.
N.T. Wright Fan wrote:I'd be interested in hearing your thoughts. What would an American Pharisee look like in the year of our Lord, 2008?
If there were American Pharisees, they would be rich, landed career politicians, out of touch with the majority of their constituents, and ruling church and government to suit themselves.
But, since this is not a theocracy and America doesn't have a state religion, there really isn't anyone who fits the bill.