Postby Mike Vande » April 24th, 2004, 3:03 am
There is no good reason to allow N2art2 in here for no better reason than to just vomit all over anyone and everyone he chooses to, and I vote to consign him to the outer darkness of cyberspace.
That being said, I need to ask, is the nature of this board changing from a benovolent dictatorship to a democracy? This move sets a precident in that direction, and I think that is a mistake.
I beg the Moderators to reconsider; this site has never been a popularity contest and this sort of thing sets that up. We have people from several denominations posting her, some of which are at odds with each other, or at least have history of that sort, and popularity as a reason for allowing someone to post could lead to an overall chilling of the candor in the debate on this board, and that debate is really the best reason I can see for J2 to exist in the form it has.
Unless you want to turn J2 into some sort of nicey-nice-pseudo-Christian site where people are afraid to say anything contrary for fear of getting voted off, you moderators, the appointed authority of this site, need to step up and deal with the guy, and not because he is unpopular but because his continued egregious insults and generally unpleasant demeanor has been evident from his first post. You are abdicating your responsibility if you don't.
He didn't come here to learn or to teach, he came to fight, and fight dirty. That ought to be reason enough to tell him "straighten up fly right, or lose the privilege of participating in the debate here".
Vande
Last edited by
Mike Vande on April 24th, 2004, 3:14 am, edited 2 times in total.
Why is it that bad decisions seem to make to most interesting testimonies?