Mary and Joseph related?

A free-wheeling forum for discussion of Christian issues.

Moderators: Pastor Gary, The J2 Mod Squad

User avatar
DeWayneTN
-= J2 =-
Posts: 4477
Joined: March 15th, 2004, 7:09 am
Location: USA,Florida
Contact:

Postby DeWayneTN » January 24th, 2008, 11:32 am

They have a new $2 million lottery in Alabama. The winner gets $2 a year for a million years.
"...The life you see me living is not 'mine,' but it is lived by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me. I am not going to go back on that."- Galatians 19:20 (The Message)
Visit my blog: www.dewaynehamby.com

Gerald Creasy

Postby Gerald Creasy » January 24th, 2008, 11:43 am

So I take a trip up north a few years ago. The ex wanted to see Falling Water. the Frank Lloyd Wright building built around a woodland stream.

So redneck me is in Pennsylvania. (Furthest North I EVER plan to go -my skin was crawlin')

The tour guide is telling about the rich family that had the house built and casually mentioned that they were first cousins. No dersion. No smartalecness nothing.

I object to the Alabama jokes and by extension the PREJUDICE that inbreeding is a southern thing.

User avatar
Brian
Da Bomb!
Posts: 944
Joined: January 29th, 2003, 7:30 pm
Location: USA,Virginia

Postby Brian » January 24th, 2008, 11:47 am

TW wrote:Joseph and Mary were both from the House of David, and as such were related to some degree. How closely is all speculation. In order to fulfill prophecy Jesus would have to come from the House of David, and since Joseph is not his biological father his linage must be traceable through Mary. As has been stated, marriage between cousins was not uncommon in the Jewish culture at that time, and Gerald has a valid point on genealogy.


TW


I have just been studing this as well and I can see that Jesus is in part the biological son of Mary and therefore has her DNA in His blood, thus tieing Him to the House of David as required by prophecy. But I was talking with someone about how the Jews don't accept that because they say that only the father counts in recognition to the family tree. The mother wouldn't have even been concidered a link to David because they say she wouldn't count. ??? I don't feel that way. DNA is DNA. If Jesus is the son of Mary he has her DNA and no amount of cultural or social seperation can stand in the way of that fact.

As far as them being cousins......I don't think anyone can know for sure. Definately they are family in some compasity, but I'm not sure that would have mattered then like it does today. Heck, isn't it thought by some that Mary was a very young woman, like in her early teens? 13? 14? That wouldn't go over to well today in America. :wink:
"My eyes are ever on the Lord, for only He will release my feet from the snare." Psalm 25:15

http://www.myspace.com/twiztidstr8

DaJudge
-= J2 =-
Posts: 4477
Joined: June 10th, 2004, 3:33 am
Location: USA,Georgia

Postby DaJudge » January 24th, 2008, 11:51 am

Gerald Creasy wrote:
I object to the Alabama jokes and by extension the PREJUDICE that inbreeding is a southern thing.


C'mon Gerald cut me a break. We Georgia boys have to be able to look down on SOMEBODY! :lol:

DaJudge
-= J2 =-
Posts: 4477
Joined: June 10th, 2004, 3:33 am
Location: USA,Georgia

Postby DaJudge » January 24th, 2008, 11:56 am

Brian wrote:I have just been studing this as well and I can see that Jesus is in part the biological son of Mary and therefore has her DNA in His blood, thus tieing Him to the House of David as required by prophecy. But I was talking with someone about how the Jews don't accept that because they say that only the father counts in recognition to the family tree. The mother wouldn't have even been concidered a link to David because they say she wouldn't count. ???


Is that the case? I read somewhere that you are deemed born Jewish base upon you mother's bloodline. For instance, if your mom is Jewish but not your father, then you are born a Jew. If you father is Jewish, but your mother isn't, you aren't born a Jew, and you have to become a Jew by conversion. The reason for that is that who your father is might be in question, but there is no doubt about who your mother is. This being the case, it would seem that the mother's bloodline is very important in Judaism. Maybe Rambo or some of you other guys can educate me if I'm wrong here.

User avatar
Brian
Da Bomb!
Posts: 944
Joined: January 29th, 2003, 7:30 pm
Location: USA,Virginia

Postby Brian » January 24th, 2008, 12:33 pm

DaJudge wrote:
Brian wrote:I have just been studing this as well and I can see that Jesus is in part the biological son of Mary and therefore has her DNA in His blood, thus tieing Him to the House of David as required by prophecy. But I was talking with someone about how the Jews don't accept that because they say that only the father counts in recognition to the family tree. The mother wouldn't have even been concidered a link to David because they say she wouldn't count. ???


Is that the case? I read somewhere that you are deemed born Jewish base upon you mother's bloodline. For instance, if your mom is Jewish but not your father, then you are born a Jew. If you father is Jewish, but your mother isn't, you aren't born a Jew, and you have to become a Jew by conversion. The reason for that is that who your father is might be in question, but there is no doubt about who your mother is. This being the case, it would seem that the mother's bloodline is very important in Judaism. Maybe Rambo or some of you other guys can educate me if I'm wrong here.


Hmm, now you have my wheels turning. I guess I have to go study now, thanks alot? :P :D
"My eyes are ever on the Lord, for only He will release my feet from the snare." Psalm 25:15



http://www.myspace.com/twiztidstr8

User avatar
Brian
Da Bomb!
Posts: 944
Joined: January 29th, 2003, 7:30 pm
Location: USA,Virginia

Postby Brian » January 24th, 2008, 12:44 pm

I was able to dig up a little bit here http://www.jewsforjesus.org/publications/issues/5_6/genealogy

"From all the genealogies in the Hebrew Scriptures, two observations become apparent. With very rare exceptions, only the male line is traced and only men's names appear. The descendancy of wommen is not given and their names are only mentioned in passing. Since biblically it was the father who determined both national and tribal identity, it was reasoned that only his line was necessary."

There is alot of other interesting things I've ran across, maybe you guys can find some useful stuff there too.
"My eyes are ever on the Lord, for only He will release my feet from the snare." Psalm 25:15



http://www.myspace.com/twiztidstr8

User avatar
rjc
I can see clearly now!
Posts: 2547
Joined: July 4th, 2005, 4:15 pm
Location: USA,Florida

Postby rjc » January 24th, 2008, 12:45 pm

DaJudge wrote:
Brian wrote:I have just been studing this as well and I can see that Jesus is in part the biological son of Mary and therefore has her DNA in His blood, thus tieing Him to the House of David as required by prophecy. But I was talking with someone about how the Jews don't accept that because they say that only the father counts in recognition to the family tree. The mother wouldn't have even been concidered a link to David because they say she wouldn't count. ???


Is that the case? I read somewhere that you are deemed born Jewish base upon you mother's bloodline. For instance, if your mom is Jewish but not your father, then you are born a Jew. If you father is Jewish, but your mother isn't, you aren't born a Jew, and you have to become a Jew by conversion. The reason for that is that who your father is might be in question, but there is no doubt about who your mother is. This being the case, it would seem that the mother's bloodline is very important in Judaism. Maybe Rambo or some of you other guys can educate me if I'm wrong here.


You are correct DaJudge, my parents had quite a few clients/friends who were Jewish and we learned a great deal about their heritage and beliefs as they also learned about ours.
rjc

2 Timothy 1:7 For God hath not given us the spirit of fear; but of power, and of love, and of a sound mind.

User avatar
Shellie
Site Admin
Posts: 8750
Joined: January 29th, 2003, 4:24 pm
Location: USA,Florida
Contact:

Postby Shellie » January 24th, 2008, 1:16 pm

We went over this in one of my classes. There was an adoption in Joseph's bloodline. I'll try to look through my notes if I still have them.
There never was a horse that couldn't be rode and there never was a cowboy that couldn't be throwed.

User avatar
pastorables
--== J2 ==--
Posts: 4748
Joined: February 9th, 2004, 10:01 am
Location: USA, Alabama
Contact:

Postby pastorables » January 24th, 2008, 4:05 pm

teach wrote:
Mississippi should so NOT be in that list!

wendy k


We had a case in our family several years ago where double first cousins married.

pa
"He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain that which he cannot lose."Jim Elliot - Missionary Martyr

Image

Gerald Creasy

Postby Gerald Creasy » January 25th, 2008, 4:11 am

pastorables wrote:We had a case in our family several years ago where double first cousins married.

pa



I don't think I'd be repeating that story.

I think a genealogy program would even have trouble with that one.

I am glad to say that in all my years of family research I've found only ONE Creasy that married a Creasy and they were at least 4th cousins (meaning they shared great-great grandfathers)

DaJudge
-= J2 =-
Posts: 4477
Joined: June 10th, 2004, 3:33 am
Location: USA,Georgia

Postby DaJudge » January 25th, 2008, 5:01 am

Gerald Creasy wrote:I am glad to say that in all my years of family research I've found only ONE Creasy that married a Creasy and they were at least 4th cousins (meaning they shared great-great grandfathers)


So I guess we'll have to explain your mental illness some other way. :lol:

Gerald Creasy

Postby Gerald Creasy » January 25th, 2008, 5:15 am

DaJudge wrote:So I guess we'll have to explain your mental illness some other way. :lol:


Now see, It's statements like that that keep words like "genteel" from ever being applied to me.

Here I am having a rather "genteel" conversation when you come along, hike yer skirts and take a dump.

DaJudge
-= J2 =-
Posts: 4477
Joined: June 10th, 2004, 3:33 am
Location: USA,Georgia

Postby DaJudge » January 25th, 2008, 5:48 am

Gerald Creasy wrote:Here I am having a rather "genteel" conversation when you come along, hike yer skirts and take a dump.


It's not a skirt. It called a kilt.

User avatar
RamboPreacher
RamboPreacher
Posts: 12355
Joined: July 17th, 2004, 5:41 pm
Location: USA, Texas

Postby RamboPreacher » January 25th, 2008, 6:21 am

Yes, they were cousins and related. but don't forget we are all related back through to Noah and to Adam. so, cousin GC, have a great day adn cousin dajudge, conservatism is alive and well! cousin Shellie and cousin Scooter, where can i get me a Harly as a retirement investment? and thanks to cousin PG for allowing all of us cousins to post and have discussions at J2. :)
Thanks, Brent "RamboPreacher" Hoefling


Return to “Jude 2 General Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests

Login  •  Register