Who would you endorse for each presidential primary?

A free-wheeling forum for discussion of Christian issues.

Moderators: Pastor Gary, The J2 Mod Squad

User avatar
EagerBeaver
--== J2 ==--
Posts: 4706
Joined: September 5th, 2003, 5:05 pm
Location: USA,Missouri
Contact:

Who would you endorse for each presidential primary?

Postby EagerBeaver » January 28th, 2008, 11:46 am

Let's take a good poll here. I can't do this in poll form because it is a two-part question in the fact that I am asking everyone to name the candidate they would endorse for EACH political party. If you're Republican, or Democrat, it doesn't matter ... you have to endorse SOMEONE from each party.

I'll start.

Republican = McCain. Even though I don't like his stance on immigration, I like his stance on just about everything else and to me he is proving himself to be more capable for the job than 9/11 Guy or Mormonite.

Democrat = Obama. Purely based on the fact that Hillary is a sociopath. Obama's got something to prove, but the Presidential stage isn't the stage to do it. Lesser of two evils here.

Find out who I'm really endorsing for president on my website.
Chris Brewer - My Website

User avatar
paul
I can see clearly now!
Posts: 2749
Joined: May 17th, 2006, 7:10 pm
Location: USA,California
Contact:

Postby paul » January 28th, 2008, 11:50 am

I would have to pretty much agree with you and make the same choices.... The clinton's are the most devious politicians in modern history, IMHO
You cannot effectively love and minister to others when you are obsessed with protecting
and preserving yourself.

User avatar
forestwalker
The 1,000 Club
Posts: 1078
Joined: July 9th, 2004, 8:04 pm
Location: USA,California

Postby forestwalker » January 28th, 2008, 11:58 am

GOP: Huckabee
He's not ready for the presidency and I'm very disappointed in his kowtowing to numskullery on a couple of issues but it doesn't matter since he wouldn't win the general election. But he's the only side I can support in the current libertarian-traditionalist civil war the GOP is going through. McCain would be second choice.

Dem: Obama
I disagree with several of his positions but he's the best-positioned to allow us to move past the pettiness and shallowness that's defined our politics since Reagan. He has potential.
For the truth that lies at the heart of theology is not something there to be discovered, but something, or rather someone, to whom we must surrender. The mystery of faith is not ultimately something that invites our questioning, but something that questions us.
Andrew Louth, Discerning the Mystery

User avatar
MacUser
Established Member
Posts: 6224
Joined: July 13th, 2004, 4:55 am
Location: USA,Mississippi

Postby MacUser » January 28th, 2008, 11:58 am

I'm sorry McCain is a nut. I greatly, greatly respect his service in the military.. but not in the Senate.

Also America doesn't need Billary. But, is chosen.. she will trounce McCain ( Remember Dole Vs Clinton? repeat.), if by some feat 71+ McCain wins the Rep nomination.
Chris -

... Behold, the Lamb of God, that taketh away the sin of the world!
John 1:29

User avatar
EagerBeaver
--== J2 ==--
Posts: 4706
Joined: September 5th, 2003, 5:05 pm
Location: USA,Missouri
Contact:

Postby EagerBeaver » January 28th, 2008, 12:09 pm

MU why ain't you a McCain fan?
Chris Brewer - My Website

User avatar
dolfan
Established Member
Posts: 8016
Joined: March 17th, 2004, 1:25 pm
Location: USA,Alabama
Contact:

Postby dolfan » January 29th, 2008, 6:35 am

GOP: Romney. I'm disappointed that my fellow Alabamians are shunning him for McCain and Huckabee, and I suspect it is more about him being Mormon than anything else. Issue for issue, he is more consistent with Alabama views than any other candidate by light years. More than any others, McCain and Huckabee have records that are against our interests on immigration, and either of them will continue to govern that way if given the office they seek. McCain never met a regulation he didn't like, and his cavalier running over the First Amendment is far scarier to me than even Bush's executive power grabs; McCain's censorship is the most dangerous of all in regulating political speech. Huckabee will spend us into oblivion, much like President Bush has, and he is pro big-government, which is anti-conservative.

Only Romney has experience and success in the private sector AND executive leadership experience. There is no question about his integrity, yet Huckabee is a proven shady dealer at best, and possibly a crook if the news articles about his, ahem, wedding gifts and furnishings as governor of Arkansas are trustworthy (and, they are and have never been refuted).

The votes in the south for McCain are last resort votes for people on the edge of just giving up, IMO. The votes here for Huckabee, IMO, have just as much to do with latent anti-Mormon sentiment and anti-Northern sentiment than they do with his actual qualifications for the office. Let me put it this way -- if Romney and Geo. W. Bush (having never been elected) were running against one another, Romney would have every qualification and then some that Bush had, and Bush won the Republican nomination walking away.

Democrats: Obama. Primarily, because he'd be the least effective of them. He'd be lead around by the nose by Senate Democrats, and would provide the best opportunity for GOP mid-term gains in 2010. I'd vote for Vladimir Putin before I'd vote for Hillary Clinton.
Human government bears the same relation to hell as the church bears to heaven. (David Lipscomb, On Civil Government, 72).

User avatar
MacUser
Established Member
Posts: 6224
Joined: July 13th, 2004, 4:55 am
Location: USA,Mississippi

Postby MacUser » January 29th, 2008, 6:48 am

EagerBeaver wrote:MU why ain't you a McCain fan?


Quickly and simply....The guy doesn't like Evangelicals and has attacked them in the past. I remember this vividly and will post links as soon as I find them. He also voted against Bush tax cuts because the Govt. couldn't "afford" it. That's my money coming back and the Govt doesn't afford anything.. but just budget differently and give it back to the people whom pay it in. I don't like that type of thinking.

Image

He is also a recently converted Global Warming nut + the fact that he lives on a border state and is oblivious to illegal immigration until he started running for President. Tons of other reasons also exist that result from his Senate service after Vietnam.

This 71+ guy has been in Washington forever.. what is HE going to do any differently that what he has also proven thus far? Hillary or Obama will trounce him. Repeat.. trounce him.

If the race is between McCain and Romney.. I'll take Romney.
Last edited by MacUser on January 29th, 2008, 6:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
Chris -



... Behold, the Lamb of God, that taketh away the sin of the world!

John 1:29

User avatar
RamboPreacher
RamboPreacher
Posts: 12355
Joined: July 17th, 2004, 5:41 pm
Location: USA, Texas

Postby RamboPreacher » January 29th, 2008, 6:48 am

Nixon
Carter
Thanks, Brent "RamboPreacher" Hoefling

DaJudge
-= J2 =-
Posts: 4477
Joined: June 10th, 2004, 3:33 am
Location: USA,Georgia

Postby DaJudge » January 29th, 2008, 7:29 am

RamboPreacher wrote:Nixon
Carter


I'd take Hillary over Jimmy Carter.

one love
Woohoo!
Posts: 3082
Joined: October 23rd, 2007, 12:48 pm
Location: USA,Virginia

Postby one love » January 29th, 2008, 8:55 am

Mitt Romney

Obama



If it is between mccain and Mitt I will choose Mitt. I would rather see guliani over mccain. Mac is right either obama or hilary will destroy mccain. We are either running against the first woman backed by the clinton power machine or the first balck president in which everything will be about race. Can you imagine if the republican wins florida by very small numbers. It will then be republicans cheated because they are racist.
I still wish Fred would have stayed in the race or got in earlier, I feel he could beat either of them. I do feel obama is the lesser of the evil.

User avatar
Paully_44
Established Member
Posts: 7480
Joined: January 30th, 2003, 4:20 am
Location: USA,Washington

Postby Paully_44 » January 29th, 2008, 9:03 am

one love wrote: I do feel obama is the lesser of the evil.


Seems like many elections boil down to this, "the lesser of the worst remaining candidates" for either party.

As for who I am voting for? not leaning toward any party yet. Guess I'll have to make up my mind soon though...... if only I could find my Magic 8 ball
Let the wild rumpus start!

User avatar
DeWayneTN
-= J2 =-
Posts: 4477
Joined: March 15th, 2004, 7:09 am
Location: USA,Florida
Contact:

Postby DeWayneTN » January 29th, 2008, 9:07 am

I am voting in the Florida primary today for Huckabee. Probably my only chance to vote for him. :-)

As far as the national election, there's a lot of mudslinging yet to go before I make my mind up. :-)
"...The life you see me living is not 'mine,' but it is lived by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me. I am not going to go back on that."- Galatians 19:20 (The Message)
Visit my blog: www.dewaynehamby.com

User avatar
rough_rider
I can see clearly now!
Posts: 2251
Joined: September 9th, 2003, 4:15 am
Location: USA,Ohio

Postby rough_rider » January 29th, 2008, 9:15 am

M. Romney :sb_okay:
F. Thompson, would have been my preference, but it was not to be.
Romney/Thompson ticket is one that I could live with...

H. Clinton :sb_ugh:

I would take Clinton over Obama, but they both are a scary thought...
In the presence of Jehovah, God almighty, Prince of peace.
Troubles vanish, hearts are mended, in the presence of
The King.
ImageImage . Image .Image

User avatar
RamboPreacher
RamboPreacher
Posts: 12355
Joined: July 17th, 2004, 5:41 pm
Location: USA, Texas

Postby RamboPreacher » January 29th, 2008, 1:13 pm

DaJudge wrote:
RamboPreacher wrote:Nixon
Carter


I'd take Hillary over Jimmy Carter.
yea, but I like peanuts. what's shrillery gonna give me? :) hehehehe
Thanks, Brent "RamboPreacher" Hoefling

User avatar
Mike Vande
I like flapjacks.
Posts: 3859
Joined: January 29th, 2003, 6:22 pm
Location: USA,Kansas

Postby Mike Vande » January 30th, 2008, 3:54 am

A different candidate for each state's caucus. That would make the conventions a lot more interesting...
Why is it that bad decisions seem to make to most interesting testimonies?


Return to “Jude 2 General Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests

Login  •  Register