Moderators: Pastor Gary, The J2 Mod Squad
dolfan wrote:Y'know, this question about Gerald's fascination with how people glom on to the Bentleys of the world has come up before. And, (I think he knows I agree with him on merit even if our temperaments about it differ) I think about Jeremiah. Everyone just shucked him off, thought he was a bit nutty, told Jeremiah jokes, etc. And, he was right. So, when I see righteous anger about stuff that's phrased in a way that demands solid biblical accountability, I tend to pay attention to that. I don't have to be Gerald to share his views, and I don't (apologies for speaking for you unsolicited, here Gerald) think he wants anyone else to be. But, he is looking for evidence that there is a certain sanity in the faith that gave him life in the Lord. If that's out of line, Gerald, I am sorry.
Pastor Gary wrote:DaJudge wrote:I don't disagree with you (or Gerald for that matter) on the Bentleys, Hinns and Copelands of the world. I'm just saying the brother needs to calm down for the sake of his health.
Nor do many of us -- the problem with trying to silence the "Geralds" of the world is that sometimes they are the only ones alerting us that the Emperor has no clothes. I prefer to have a few voices challenging the assumptions of the easily duped masses to the mass guzzling of the kool-aid of deception.
If Gerald is right, we all owe him a debt of thanks for warning us. If he is wrong, he won't slow or stop the real move of God.
Jennifer Smith wrote:I agree to a point, but there are many who will not receive a needed healing or touch of refreshing from the Lord because of unnecessary mistrust and ambivalence due to that influence. And, the fleshly manner in which he approaches his warnings is a tip off that they are not motivated by the Spirit, or at least are not continuing in the Spirit.. I say that with respect for the person, but not for the manner in which he conducts his ministry.
Gerald Creasy wrote:
Your question is nonsensical. How can there be a scripture that says there are no female angels.
There are no Female angels mentioned in the Bible.

Steve wrote:dawgs10 wrote:i am saying that people that have been there have painted a different picture of what is going on than you have...
Here is an example of what is going on. Can you honestly say this is of God? I am astounded at how many people are mislead by this fool.
At one point the comedy relief (Jeff) says that "...we're gonna laugh the HELL out of people!" When they get to hell, there won't be any laughing. God help those people.
Gerald Creasy wrote:One of the things GOOD I got from COGOP raising is a respect for scripture.
Gerald Creasy wrote:I am a hairs breadth from never setting foot in a Pentecostal organization again.

pastorables wrote:The Bible only mentions angel names and gender probably less than 30 times. With literally tens of thousands of angels, I am not willing to proclaim them all male based upon scriptural silence concerning gender.
Blessings,
pa
pastorables wrote:Gerald Creasy wrote:One of the things GOOD I got from COGOP raising is a respect for scripture.
Gerald,
I am sincerely impressed by this statement. I didn't receive the same, but rather God taught me later in life. To the contrary, I was told by leaders (even from HQ) that we do not question teachings (even with the Bible), etc.
Gerald Creasy wrote:I am a hairs breadth from never setting foot in a Pentecostal organization again.
I am going to take this statement as satirical.
Jennifer Smith wrote:Gerald Creasy wrote:Jennifer Smith wrote:Will COGOP soon be annointing virgins to carrry revival, seeing Dead people, getting down on all fours and braying like mules?????
Talk about painting a picture...Imo, it is wrong to paint the construed and misleading images you portray of those services.
A Florida Newspaper reported Bentley annointed "virgins" to spread revival.
Todd Bentley claims God shows him dead people. His own words can be found to describe the experience.
I SAW him on their telecast get down on all fours and laugh crazily throwing his head back and forth like a braying mule.
YET WHEN I TELL YOU ALL THESE FACTS I am "painting a picture"!
Fair enough, when these facts are verified then they will be considered facts.
BTW, you didn't answer my other questions...!:wink:
Answer: The Bible does not necessarily support the gender of angels being male or female. Whenever gender is specifically “assigned” to an angel in Scripture, it is male (Genesis 19:10-12; Revelation 7:2; 8:3; 10:7). However, this does not necessarily indicate that angels are male. Matthew 22:30 seems to indicate that angels are “sexless,” without gender: “At the resurrection people will neither marry nor be given in marriage; they will be like the angels in heaven.” If angels do not procreate, there is no need for gender, at least not in the sense of human gender distinctions.
In a similar manner, God always refers to Himself in masculine language, although God is neither male nor female. He just uses masculine language because it more adequately describes who He is and what He does, especially in the patriarchal cultures in which the Bible was written. If angels do have a gender, in some form, Scripture would indicate that they are predominately or universally male. It is more likely that angels are genderless, just as God is, and that masculine language is just used to describe them and their role in serving God.
dolfan wrote:I found this quote:Answer: The Bible does not necessarily support the gender of angels being male or female. Whenever gender is specifically “assigned” to an angel in Scripture, it is male (Genesis 19:10-12; Revelation 7:2; 8:3; 10:7). However, this does not necessarily indicate that angels are male. Matthew 22:30 seems to indicate that angels are “sexless,” without gender: “At the resurrection people will neither marry nor be given in marriage; they will be like the angels in heaven.” If angels do not procreate, there is no need for gender, at least not in the sense of human gender distinctions.
In a similar manner, God always refers to Himself in masculine language, although God is neither male nor female. He just uses masculine language because it more adequately describes who He is and what He does, especially in the patriarchal cultures in which the Bible was written. If angels do have a gender, in some form, Scripture would indicate that they are predominately or universally male. It is more likely that angels are genderless, just as God is, and that masculine language is just used to describe them and their role in serving God.
That seems to me to be a sound method of interpreting and applying the Scriptures. I don't think we can be dogmatic about it, and our salvation doesn't rest on the gender of angels or the lack of gender of angels. And, I think, really, the point about Bentley referring to a female angel is the least of the problems this guy has. If you take that issue away, as if it never arose in Bentley's speeches, it doesn't add to or reduce the guy's credibility. It stands or falls wholly on other grounds without regard to the angel-gender reference and is altogether not impacted by it. In his case, as I understand God and His Word, Bentley falls.
Gerald Creasy wrote:pastorables wrote:The Bible only mentions angel names and gender probably less than 30 times. With literally tens of thousands of angels, I am not willing to proclaim them all male based upon scriptural silence concerning gender.
Blessings,
pa
Then you are willing to "add to" what the Bible is silent about;
what makes you think you have that right?

Return to “Jude 2 General Discussion Forum”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests