Pastor Gary wrote:RamboPreacher wrote:Pastor Gary wrote:RamboPreacher wrote:mat, sorry, I disagree on that logic, since I believe that the tithe is paid first, not last.
To clarify: If you were the owner of a small mom & pop store, you would tithe on gross sales receipts? Not net profits after expenses?
I had a sole proprietorship/business, and that apples and rocks comparison, sorry. However, in my business as the overhead was always minimal, and I was a service provider, yes, in fact, I did pay tithe on gross sales receipts.
with that said, and back to my comment, I can't see how, and don't believe that pastoring a church and owning a retail business is the same thing at all, financially.
the pastor is an employee of the church (COGOP finances). they don't run a church-business with sales/product overhead. but then, that is my personal conviction. IF I were a pastor, I would pay tithe on any income/increase that came in, first. and deduct any appropriate expenses from taxes. OR, if available, would use those receipts for church reimbursement (still after the tithe).
For the sake of discussion, let me toss out some things:
• A pastor feels it important to always be accessible to his members at all times, so he contracts for a huge block of cellular minutes... far more than he would have for normal, casual, family use. Business expense? Cost-of-doing-business overhead?
this is a tax write off, or business expense - may be overhead, but it really isn't otherwise required. either way, the tithe from his paycheck from the church would be paid first (in my conviction).
• A personal one: I live in Hawaii. We don't wear suits, ever. I perform weddings and funerals in casual clothing. At the Assembly, I am told that I must wear suits to certain events and meetings. I am, therefore, compelled to purchase, essentially, a set of "uniforms" that are of absolutely zero use to me outside of this requirement. It is, in my view, a waste of money, funds I would never have chosen to spend this way, and an absolutely business overhead expense, little different from a business entrepreneur who must comply with OSHA regulations providing mandated safety gear.
I agree completely - and is either a tax deduction, or an expense if there is funding and F/S agreement. Still not affecting the paying of the tithe from what the church pays the pastor.
I contend that Pastors are NOT in the classic sense employees of COGOP, but are more akin to self-employed contract workers.
agreed with the paradigm, but since the pastor gets a W2, and it is actually incorrect (not to mention, illegal, as I understand) to do the 1099. but still apples and rocks to compare a pastor to a retail sales business owner. it may be more like a service provider, though.
a point of clarification is that I am talking about expenses that are reimbursed are separate from the pastors "salary", and should be completely separate, in my opinion, and not counted as part of that income, as the expenses potentially change from day to day and week to week, month to month and year to year.
This MAY be addressed similarly to the housing allotment, in that the pastor still gets a certain "salary" (I really dislike saying it like that, since hopefully being a pastor is a calling, and not a "job"), but the reported amount in taxes is minus that allotment.
With that said, it is my opinion, and conviction that I would pay the tithe first, and on the amount the church "pays" them, not the amount that is "reported" to the IRS as "income" (W2, box 1), since it is that full amount that is otherwise listed (including the allotment that is noted on the W2, box 14).