Postby Poimen » July 19th, 2008, 8:30 am
Never read it. I disagree with the whole fundamental translation philosophy of the NIV(s). It is essentially more a paraphrase than a translation.
However, the use of gender neutral terms is not improper, depending on the terms and context. Some of the Greek terms translated with a male gender slant into Old English did not have the same gender application Greek, from what I've read.
In that case, unless there is qualifying content surrounding the term that indicates gender specificity, it would seem more accurate to use a more neutral, universal term. For instance, women do not become "sons" of God. They become "daughters" of God. So, where the term rendered son, refers to both men and women, it is no injustice to translate it "child" or "children."
Poimen
Bro. Christopher
"I wish a buck was still silver, it was back when the country was strong." -- The Hag