Sis. Osteen in trouble?

KBevangelist · Postby **KBevangelist** » August 7th, 2008, 4:15 am

Sis. Osteen is in trouble.

The flight attendant is suing for 10% of her net worth

http://www.ajc.com/news/content/news/st ... sault.html

KB

pastorsa1 · Postby **pastorsa1** » August 7th, 2008, 4:21 am

Some people will do anything for money!! :roll:

dolfan · Postby **dolfan** » August 7th, 2008, 4:30 am

Even if she did it, and she may very well have for all I know, so what? They got the family tossed from the plane, the FAA fined her $3K, and no bones were broken and there was real physical injury to speak of. If I'm on that jury, I might find in favor of the Plaintiff for $1. You can't collect (or shouldn't be able to but who knows how the jury will weight it) for damaged faith. You don't get hemorrhoids from an elbow to the chest and an in-the-face dose of disillusionment. You certainly shouldn't need psychological counseling over it, IMO. It looks on the face of it like a spoiled rotten diva who's used to having everyone bow to her vs. a grubby little opportunist drama queen.

DeWayneTN · Postby **DeWayneTN** » August 7th, 2008, 4:33 am

No doubt it's a money grub. If things happened as the flight attendant said it did, which I'd be inclined to believe, she has quite a temper, but I seriously doubt she really caused that lady any harm. Because of her position, Victoria probably wouldn't counter-sue but with the damage the headlines are doing, I'd be inclined to take a look at it.

PastorDaniel · Postby **PastorDaniel** » August 7th, 2008, 4:36 am

I just don't see how getting shoved can give you roids!! :roll:

Officer...that little woman knocked the poop out of me!! And now I'm so nervous I can't pucker back up...please protect me :lol:

dolfan · Postby **dolfan** » August 7th, 2008, 4:37 am

DeWayneTN wrote:No doubt it's a money grub. If things happened as the flight attendant said it did, which I'd be inclined to believe, she has quite a temper, but I seriously doubt she really caused that lady any harm. Because of her position, Victoria probably wouldn't counter-sue but with the damage the headlines are doing, I'd be inclined to take a look at it.

What would she sue the flight attendant for, though? Telling the truth in public? That's the danger of celebrities showing their tempers. Ask Bob "Sock-It-To-Me" Schuller.

DeWayneTN · Postby **DeWayneTN** » August 7th, 2008, 4:41 am

All she was doing was giving her best shove now!!

dolfan · Postby **dolfan** » August 7th, 2008, 4:44 am

Now, that's probably true! She probably was doing her best, and that's a personal strength!! Whatever your hands find to do, do it with all your might. (Eccl. 9:10) :lol:

Gerald Creasy · Postby **Gerald Creasy** » August 7th, 2008, 7:28 am

Sister Osteen!?????

People that preach "Jesus is Mammon's fetch it boy" and "power of words" witchcraft hardly qualify as family.

forestwalker · Postby **forestwalker** » August 7th, 2008, 9:09 am

pastorsa1 wrote:Some people will do anything for money!!

You talking about the Osteens or the flight attendant?

Jennifer Smith · Postby **Jennifer Smith** » August 7th, 2008, 9:40 am

I think we should call the fashion police, because that flowered jacket is

just wrong! :lol:

I don't know what else to say, I wasn't there... but I will say I

hate it when I am somewhere such as a restaurant with Christians, & they

are demanding with servers. Like one time we had a guest evangelist, in

fact he was from the Hillsong church, an Austrailian guy.... maybe it is just

their culture, or his personality...but he was very demanding about the

onions in his fajitas... I dislike that.

I hope it works out somehow for the good... for both parties, ouch. :oops:

pastorables · Postby **pastorables** » August 7th, 2008, 3:28 pm

This is ludicrous. Would the flight attendant have sued if the alleged perpetrator had of been my Aunt Lillie? :roll:

pastorables · Postby **pastorables** » August 7th, 2008, 3:30 pm

DeWayneTN wrote: which I'd be inclined to believe, she has quite a temper,

DeWayne,

I'm curious to know how you have this privileged information?

pa

DeWayneTN · Postby **DeWayneTN** » August 7th, 2008, 4:03 pm

I should rephrase that sentence. I meant that if things happened that way, she has quite a temper and (separate thought) I have no reason to believe things happened differently. I muddied it up a little but no, I don't have any priviledged information.

pastorables · Postby **pastorables** » August 7th, 2008, 6:22 pm

Why has this event took so long to end up in trial if it took place in 2005? Was the trial delay a due process delay or did the flight attendant just recently decide to sue? If the latter is the case, they should throw it out now.

Is there not a statute of limitations on these types of lawsuits?

Jude 2