jinjer wrote:In fact, the ignorance was in Sarah Palin who exposed her child to down's syndrome by giving birth after 40
You know, I was going to respond to this with correct medical information, but I don't think it is worth my time.
Jinjer
So THAT'S why Michael Jackson wears that mask all the time. He doesn't want to catch Down's Syndrome.
Who new: Sarah Palin didn't "expose her child" to it. The child was born with it. It is a genetic code problem tied, at times, to the age of the ovum at the time of conception. An older ovum (that's an egg for you and the folks in Rio Lindo) will carry an extra copy of a chromosome that is particularly receptive to a certain chromosome found in sperm cells that, when they link, results in the DS. If she'd been 35 at the time of conception, the risk would've been elevated. At 42, it would be even higher.
FYI: My wife has an IQ of 145. Her mother's age when she was born? 42.
Connection? Nope, probably not. But, I doubt we'd be having this conversation if the news had broken that the young Palin had engaged in intercourse with a boy and she turned into a genius. There is no proven link between exposure to semen and catching intelligence, either, in case you were wondering. Just so we're clear on that. Take Paris Hilton as a case in point. She oughta be Einstein by now.
Human government bears the same relation to hell as the church bears to heaven. (David Lipscomb, On Civil Government, 72).