OJ Simpson

A free-wheeling forum for discussion of Christian issues.

Moderators: Pastor Gary, The J2 Mod Squad

User avatar
Shellie
Site Admin
Posts: 8750
Joined: January 29th, 2003, 4:24 pm
Location: USA,Florida
Contact:

Postby Shellie » October 5th, 2008, 11:38 am

Pastorables wrote:

There is absolutely no way that O.J. could have received a fair trial.


That's okay. Nicole didn't receive a fair one either.
There never was a horse that couldn't be rode and there never was a cowboy that couldn't be throwed.

User avatar
EagerBeaver
--== J2 ==--
Posts: 4706
Joined: September 5th, 2003, 5:05 pm
Location: USA,Missouri
Contact:

Postby EagerBeaver » October 5th, 2008, 11:50 am

Shellie wrote:Pastorables wrote:

There is absolutely no way that O.J. could have received a fair trial.


That's okay. Nicole didn't receive a fair one either.


In the words of Todd Bentley,

BAM!
Chris Brewer - My Website

DaJudge
-= J2 =-
Posts: 4477
Joined: June 10th, 2004, 3:33 am
Location: USA,Georgia

Postby DaJudge » October 5th, 2008, 11:52 am

Mike Vande wrote:
DaJudge wrote:Vande, I wasn't talking about sin, I was talking about a violation of the law.


You don't think violations of the law are also sin?


Often they are. Some I don't think are, such as speeding/parking tickets, failing to wear a motorcycle helmet or seat belt. Others involving "moral turpitude" clearly are sins. Theft, murder, assaults, etc. Some things that are sins aren't against the law. Lying, adultery, etc.

But that's not really the point here. I was talking about laws that OJ violated. Murder and Armed Robbery to be specific. He deserves, under the law to serve every day of the remainder of his life in jail under the law. He can be forgiven by God just like anyone else. But methinks the State of Nevada ain't gonna be quite as generous.

User avatar
soulsearcher
What's next?
Posts: 3375
Joined: August 29th, 2006, 5:35 am
Location: USA,Florida

Postby soulsearcher » October 5th, 2008, 1:49 pm

EagerBeaver wrote:In the words of Todd Bentley,


BAM!


"BAM!" is the word of Emeril Lagasse as far as I'm concerned, since he's the one who made it famous. :)

Now, if you had said, "In the words of Todd Bentley, SHAM! - - or SCAM!" I might have related. :lol:

User avatar
Brian
Da Bomb!
Posts: 944
Joined: January 29th, 2003, 7:30 pm
Location: USA,Virginia

Postby Brian » October 5th, 2008, 2:03 pm

DaJudge wrote:
Mike Vande wrote:
DaJudge wrote:Vande, I wasn't talking about sin, I was talking about a violation of the law.


You don't think violations of the law are also sin?


Often they are. Some I don't think are, such as speeding/parking tickets, failing to wear a motorcycle helmet or seat belt. Others involving "moral turpitude" clearly are sins. Theft, murder, assaults, etc. Some things that are sins aren't against the law. Lying, adultery, etc.

But that's not really the point here. I was talking about laws that OJ violated. Murder and Armed Robbery to be specific. He deserves, under the law to serve every day of the remainder of his life in jail under the law. He can be forgiven by God just like anyone else. But methinks the State of Nevada ain't gonna be quite as generous.


From O' Brother Where Art Thou:

Pete: The Preacher said it absolved us.
Everett: For him, not for the law. I'm surprised at you, Pete, I gave you credit for more brains than Delmar.
Delmar: But they was witnesses that seen us redeemed.
Everett: That's not the issue Delmar. Even if that did put you square with the Lord, the State of Mississippi's (Nevada) a little more hard-nosed.

One of my favoite movies! :)
"My eyes are ever on the Lord, for only He will release my feet from the snare." Psalm 25:15

http://www.myspace.com/twiztidstr8

User avatar
dolfan
Established Member
Posts: 8016
Joined: March 17th, 2004, 1:25 pm
Location: USA,Alabama
Contact:

Postby dolfan » October 5th, 2008, 4:53 pm

I wondered if he could receive a fair trial. But, here's the deal -- OJ Simpson is an icon, a pariah, but an icon. No one (white) who remembers that trial is going to have any different opinion but that he was probably guilty. That outcome in that case -- and in the civil case -- had a direct bearing on his motives in this case. The connection was not just psychological. It was relevant in this case. There's almost no one in the country who cannot harbor some feelings about the extent of justice in the old case. I don't know, though, how much those feelings were allowed to color jurors' jobs in this one. This is one that has some very interesting possibilities on appeal, and it wouldn't shock me to see a new trial ordered. For one, there were no black people on the jury. That, with the admitted bias by the jurors, leads me to think this case may not be over. Then again, the judge in the case may have perfectly followed the law and properly exercised every discretion at his disposal. I don't know. I didn't really keep up with it this time.
Human government bears the same relation to hell as the church bears to heaven. (David Lipscomb, On Civil Government, 72).

User avatar
Mike Vande
I like flapjacks.
Posts: 3859
Joined: January 29th, 2003, 6:22 pm
Location: USA,Kansas

Postby Mike Vande » October 5th, 2008, 5:18 pm

DaJudge wrote: Often they are. Some I don't think are, such as speeding/parking tickets, failing to wear a motorcycle helmet or seat belt.


I think the Bible instructs us to submit to the authority over us unless that authority contradicts the teachings of God. Acting like you are a law unto yourself in matters like traffic regulations, etc., kinda makes things like that a sin, doesn't it?


DaJudge wrote:Others involving "moral turpitude" clearly are sins. Theft, murder, assaults, etc.


No argument there.

DaJudge wrote:Some things that are sins aren't against the law. Lying, adultery, etc.


Well, they aren't illegal now, but then a lot of things that used be illegal aren't any more...
Why is it that bad decisions seem to make to most interesting testimonies?

DaJudge
-= J2 =-
Posts: 4477
Joined: June 10th, 2004, 3:33 am
Location: USA,Georgia

Postby DaJudge » October 6th, 2008, 1:57 am

Mike Vande wrote:I think the Bible instructs us to submit to the authority over us unless that authority contradicts the teachings of God. Acting like you are a law unto yourself in matters like traffic regulations, etc., kinda makes things like that a sin, doesn't it?


Yep. That's why I paid the tickets. That's why OJ is gonna rot in jail. Thanks for bringing this discussion back around to my original point Vande.

User avatar
Mike Vande
I like flapjacks.
Posts: 3859
Joined: January 29th, 2003, 6:22 pm
Location: USA,Kansas

Postby Mike Vande » October 6th, 2008, 12:56 pm

DaJudge wrote:
Mike Vande wrote:I think the Bible instructs us to submit to the authority over us unless that authority contradicts the teachings of God. Acting like you are a law unto yourself in matters like traffic regulations, etc., kinda makes things like that a sin, doesn't it?


Yep. That's why I paid the tickets. That's why OJ is gonna rot in jail. Thanks for bringing this discussion back around to my original point Vande.


You must be a pretty good lawyer. You affirmed that breaking the law was a sin without admitting you said it wasn't a sin. Puts me in mind of gnats and camels...
Why is it that bad decisions seem to make to most interesting testimonies?

DaJudge
-= J2 =-
Posts: 4477
Joined: June 10th, 2004, 3:33 am
Location: USA,Georgia

Postby DaJudge » October 6th, 2008, 1:28 pm

Take one of your happy pills and lie down, Vande. :D

User avatar
Mike Vande
I like flapjacks.
Posts: 3859
Joined: January 29th, 2003, 6:22 pm
Location: USA,Kansas

Postby Mike Vande » October 7th, 2008, 5:39 am

DaJudge wrote:Take one of your happy pills and lie down, Vande. :D


Already took my dose for the day, Judge. Seems like you might need to join me?
Why is it that bad decisions seem to make to most interesting testimonies?

DaJudge
-= J2 =-
Posts: 4477
Joined: June 10th, 2004, 3:33 am
Location: USA,Georgia

Postby DaJudge » October 7th, 2008, 6:04 am

Mike Vande wrote:
DaJudge wrote:Take one of your happy pills and lie down, Vande. :D


Already took my dose for the day, Judge. Seems like you might need to join me?


I'll pass.

User avatar
Mike Vande
I like flapjacks.
Posts: 3859
Joined: January 29th, 2003, 6:22 pm
Location: USA,Kansas

Postby Mike Vande » October 7th, 2008, 6:36 am

DaJudge wrote:I'll pass.


Yes, well, I hope you'll pass in a way that is both a legal and moral...
Why is it that bad decisions seem to make to most interesting testimonies?

DaJudge
-= J2 =-
Posts: 4477
Joined: June 10th, 2004, 3:33 am
Location: USA,Georgia

Postby DaJudge » October 7th, 2008, 8:53 am

Mike Vande wrote:
DaJudge wrote:I'll pass.


Yes, well, I hope you'll pass in a way that is both a legal and moral...


Sheeesh, and YOU like to call people on the carpet for being judgmental. Talk about sanctimonious. :roll:

User avatar
Mike Vande
I like flapjacks.
Posts: 3859
Joined: January 29th, 2003, 6:22 pm
Location: USA,Kansas

Postby Mike Vande » October 7th, 2008, 10:23 am

DaJudge wrote:Sheeesh, and YOU like to call people on the carpet for being judgmental. Talk about sanctimonious. :roll:


Pardon me Judge, did I hit a nerve or something? I thought we were kidding around...or was that remark about my "happy pills" a real shot, and not a joke?
Why is it that bad decisions seem to make to most interesting testimonies?


Return to “Jude 2 General Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests

Login  •  Register