MacUser wrote:Hey Tim... I was one of the three that voted for you. Boy am I sorry now? Nah.. it was sincere. Glad you enjoyed it.
No kidding? I would not have expected that. Wow, that's cool. Thanks for that. I probably won't be as enteraining this time around, because I think I've calmed down a bit.
MacUser wrote:Btw.. were you not the HUGE McCain fan? When he was nominated.. I thought you would have posted then. If you don't support him.. what changed?
I still think McCain is okay. He'd be an improvement over Bush Jr. A number of things caused me to lose my enthusiasm for him: he voted for the bailout; I agree with Pat Buchanan's foreign policy on Russia, and McCain/Obama were 180 degrees from it; he lost me when he sang "Bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb, Iran"; he seemed to back down from his torture position due to political calculations; Joe Liebermann's support for him appeared to be based solely on McCain's alignment with the Israeli lobby, which makes me suspicious, not because I don't want peace for Israel, but because I believe that pandering to the right-wing in Israel without putting real pressure on it to give up the West Bank settlements will not bring peace; McCain comes with the Republican party, which has proven derelect of major conservative principles recently.
I do, however, think that his position on free trade is sound and superior to Obama's stated protectionism and that he would not simply be another four more years of President Bush. His basic instincts are not neoconservative, which is a plus in my book. What bothers me about both McCain and Obama is that they, like their parties, are in the pocket of Wall Street. Obama will not change anything fundamental in terms of the money power structure status quo by which the Plutocracy has its way with this country, and neither would McCain if he were elected.
"And just when you think you've got me figured out, remember, No man ever steps in the same river twice, for it is not the same river and he is not the same man." --Heraclitus