PastorDaniel wrote:Poimen,
You bring up an interesting topic...I've never heard the idea of a "sub-movement" could you please clarify a little more...
I know about "oneness" churches...I was United Pentecostal for 8 years...
Are you saying that there was oneness believers that maintained their membership in the TCOG?
And...was there a TCOG congregation that was oneness?
Just curious?
I still fellowship with several Apostolics (oneness believers)....but I'm a COGOP pastor...Since I left the UPC and ended up back in the COGOP, I find that their are very few "oneness" believers that accept me as a Christian...
Well, by sub-movement I mean a movement (whether institutionalized or not) that takes place within the context of the COG movement or any of it's institutions. For instance the "concerned" was a movement within COGOP that led to a new branch on the COG tree. Snake Handling was a movement within the COG that led to a loose fellowship or sectarian movement.
In the same way there was a movement within TCOG to embrace a Oneness view of the God-head. Several members from various churches held that position, and many retained membership. However, two (which were also ministers) were eventually disfellowshipped. One of the two did not have his license revoked (an oversight for sure), and these ministers established and received members into a TCOG that espoused an Apostolic Oneness perspective with regard to the nature of God. Eventually one of the ministers was restored and the other went indepedent. The Apostolic TCOG went defunct. But it was a viable movement that claimed the COG mantle and/or heritage, with an established congregation at one time.
![Remember our veterans and troops currently serving today. [amer-ribbon90.gif]](/images/amer-ribbon90.gif)