United States Foreign Policy Question...

Russell Roberts · Postby **Russell Roberts** » November 12th, 2008, 4:42 am

Don't you think that the United States should support dividing Jerusalem? After all, we have a bunch more Palestinian brothers than ethnic Jewish brothers. Though Christians often believe otherwise, Paul clearly taught that fleshly descent from Abraham counts for NOTHING!

crispfin · Postby **crispfin** » November 12th, 2008, 5:29 am

The whole question of what to do with Jerusalem is a powder keg and I feel sorry for anyone who has to deal with that issue. Even though the city is already pretty much divided into the new city which is mostly Jewish and the old city which is mostly Palestinian, getting both sides to come to terms on dividing the city and how they would do it would be a near miracle in my view. Oh, and it would cause John Hagee to have an aneurysm. :shock:

Russell Roberts · Postby **Russell Roberts** » November 12th, 2008, 5:36 am

Oh, and it would cause John Hagee to have an aneurysm.

dolfan · Postby **dolfan** » November 12th, 2008, 5:39 am

Vegas odds on Hagee having a cholesterol-driven stroke before having a Jerusalem-division-related aneurysm, anyone???

I'm kidding. I don't dislike Hagee in particular, and I'm not angling for a division of Jerusalem in any particular manner either. But, I do wonder, given his size and temperament, which one is likely to happen first.

Russell Roberts · Postby **Russell Roberts** » November 12th, 2008, 5:41 am

dolfan wrote:Vegas odds on Hagee having a cholesterol-driven stroke before having a Jerusalem-division-related aneurysm, anyone???

I'm kidding. I don't dislike Hagee in particular, and I'm not angling for a division of Jerusalem in any particular manner either. But, I do wonder, given his size and temperament, which one is likely to happen first.

Dolfan, I'm going with Hagee's aneurysm. I have a lot against Hagee. He misleads thousands of Christians and denigrates the work of Jesus Christ.

dolfan · Postby **dolfan** » November 12th, 2008, 6:06 am

Of course he does, but he's no worse than the other charlatans on TBN. That's why I say I don't dislike him in particular. He's a run of the mill nut.

Russell Roberts · Postby **Russell Roberts** » November 12th, 2008, 6:09 am

dolfan wrote:Of course he does, but he's no worse than the other charlatans on TBN. That's why I say I don't dislike him in particular. He's a run of the mill nut.

Dolfan, I think we can agree that we both dislike them all equally? :lol:

crispfin · Postby **crispfin** » November 12th, 2008, 7:55 am

dolfan wrote:Vegas odds on Hagee having a cholesterol-driven stroke before having a Jerusalem-division-related aneurysm, anyone???

I'm kidding. I don't dislike Hagee in particular, and I'm not angling for a division of Jerusalem in any particular manner either. But, I do wonder, given his size and temperament, which one is likely to happen first.

Hmm, cholesterol driven stroke vs. divided Jerusalem aneurysm . . . maybe we should have a poll . . . j/k, seriously, nobody make a poll! And just for the record, I have no particular ill will against John Hagee in the sense that I haven't figured out any specific thing I want to happen to him. :twisted:

PastorDaniel · Postby **PastorDaniel** » November 12th, 2008, 9:35 am

crispfinagin wrote:The whole question of what to do with Jerusalem is a powder keg and I feel sorry for anyone who has to deal with that issue. Even though the city is already pretty much divided into the new city which is mostly Jewish and the old city which is mostly Palestinian, getting both sides to come to terms on dividing the city and how they would do it would be a near miracle in my view. Oh, and it would cause John Hagee to have an aneurysm.

Of course it would...he'd have nothing left to preach.... :wink:

Jude 2