Postby Tim Elston » November 20th, 2008, 6:46 pm
We can think of conservatism both as something concrete and as something abstract. I think highly of conservatism in the abstract. I think highly of liberalism in the abstract, too.
The problems with liberalism lie in how it is actually manifested politically and socially. Well, lo and behold, it's at the concrete level that conservatism has its faults, too. This is where it can be criticised. Whoever found something in a perfect ideal to criticize? Perfect ideals like conservatism and liberalism are beyond criticism. But conservatism and liberalism as they actually occur are not. So, I level my criticism at conservatism as it is actually practised.
Conservatism is often resistant to change where change is warranted. Can anyone in COGOP say, "TCOG"?
Conservatism is often murderously nationalistic. Can anyone say, "Serbian nationalism"?
Conservatism often compartmentalizes its interests from its compassion. Can anyone from the 1970s say, "Fag"?
Conservatism often dehumanizes people to cope with fear. Can anyone say, "All Muslims are terrorists"?
Conservatism is often too easily manipulated. Can anyone say, "Lee Atwater"?
Conservatism is often hateful. Can anyone say, "Matthew Shephard"?
Conservatism is often anti-intellectual. Can anyone say, "Pointy-headed professor"?
Conservatism is often partisan. Can anyone say, "All Democrats are evil"?
Conservatism is often paranoid. Can anyone say, "November 4, 2008 --The Day America Died"?
Need I go on?
"And just when you think you've got me figured out, remember, No man ever steps in the same river twice, for it is not the same river and he is not the same man." --Heraclitus