Honest question from Irthnvesl

[DaJudge]

You said not to hurt your feelings, so...

I don't care for your posts and don't read them. It's not so much WHAT you say. It's the AMOUNT of things you say.

1000 posts in 2 months? Absolutely insane. I tried to read your posts at first but I burnt out on you in the first week you joined the board.

Keep posting or not; it doesn't matter to me. But chances are, I'm not going to be reading what you write. It's just too much.

[Jennifer Smith]

You may not know this but many people on this board came over from the forum that shall not be mentioned because on that board certain views were not allowed to be challenged. We came here for the freedom to challenge. This board has been instrumental in creating changes.

It's interesting to note, though, that theological/doctrinal beliefs can be challenged but not political ones (thinking of Tim here). Speaks to what really forms our minds and what we really most strongly believe?

I think at times we are a bit too touchy.. maybe even about doctrine. It's hard though, values and beliefs are formed painfully and honestly. Sometimes it is the way it is presented. I could say, " you might want to consider this,"

Or, I can throw it in your face! But if I do that, I may just aggravate you-

and then there is the old saying, "A man convinced against his will... is of the same opinion still."

I have to say when I read Tim's and irthn's posts I really don't think they mean to challenge that way.

[TW]

To post, or not to post? That is the question!


There are times when I wish you would just shut-up. You can, and have, on occasion diminished the value of what you were trying to say by the very volume of post citing the same material, source, or reference. Once is enough. State your case in clear, concise language and let the reader form their own opinion. At present there are 943 members, and on any given day, on any given topic there will be 943 different opinions of varying degrees of agreement. You views are most likely much more "mainstream" than mine. However, the one common thread that binds us together is Jesus Christ.

The two things that I would like to impart to you are. First, respect that others probably will not see things exactly as you do. And second, when all that can be said has been said, drop it.


TW

[Tim Elston]

You can, and have, on occasion diminished the value of what you were trying to say by the very volume of post citing the same material, source, or reference. Once is enough.

irthnvesl,

TW has a point. On the other hand, once is usually not enough. Maybe somewhere in between. But, honestly, say all you want. I don't read all your posts, but I enjoy the ones I do read. You're a lot of fun and you have a big heart. The board would be diminished without you.

[scooter]

It's interesting to note, though, that theological/doctrinal beliefs can be challenged but not political ones (thinking of Tim here). Speaks to what really forms our minds and what we really most strongly believe?

Response: I think you may have a bit of a misunderstanding.

Most doctrinal theological challenges here are based in semantics, word play, etc.

If someone attacks the diety of Christ, the validity of the Trinity, or some other fundamental aspect of the faith sparks still fly.

The diametric difference between people who support our armed forces and those that call them baby killers is one that raises the ire of most sane individuals.

[Shellie]

scooter wrote:

The diametric difference between people who support our armed forces and those that call them baby killers is one that raises the ire of most sane individuals.

Sane being the operative word.

[one love]

I think your fine Brother. I may not agree with much of what you say and simply do not have the time to read it all but you make me laugh

So dont worry about that, not everyone wants to hear me all the time.

Hope you have a blessed day.

Tim I will say I admire your passion, I disagree with a lot of it but aside from that you have been kind and I enjoy you being here as well. You should get into debate for a living or get a show with Hannity and go round for round
BTW Tim what did you serve in? I read something in a post that you were in the intelligence community is that correct?

[soulsearcher]

irthnvesl, I have no problem with your posts because, as a couple of others have stated, I don't read much of them due to the sheer volume of threads and word length.

I have experienced (as most of us have) the feeling of not being wanted, needed, and all the in-betweens. As a fellow brother in Christ, I believe you have a good heart. That's enough for me. Welcome.

[Russell Roberts]

Thank you all for your comments. I will reduce the volume of my posts. Actually, I already have.

Be blessed.

[teach]

I don't have a problem with you, but I really don't read much of your posts either...

wendy k

[Tim Elston]

BTW Tim what did you serve in? I read something in a post that you were in the intelligence community is that correct?

I was an Arabic linguist in the Air Force, from 1997-1991. I served during the Gulf War and was stationed in Athens, Greece.

Irthnvesl, thanks for letting me answer this question here. Sometimes it's hard to know when to start a new thread or just reply in-line.

[free]

Irthnvesl...I'll say what no one else will...We don't like your kind around here...You come into our "house" and spew your nonsense...Using up all of the posting space...Posting insanely long post that are more like novels...No sir, we don't like you or your post. Please for the love of Pete pack your stuff, get out of here and leave us alone!!

Seriously Irthinvesl...I'm glad you're here and many of your post have made me stop and think but I do agree with some that a few less would be better IMHO...But I'll let the mod squad handle that.

Be blessed!

[Russell Roberts]

No problemo. And just for the record, I like reading your posts. You are very well spoken and present though-provoking arguments.

[forestwalker]

Sane being the operative word.

Indeed.

[dolfan]

I'm okay as long as you don't start quoting Rosie O'Donnell or anyone on The View (I'd just be sick on the spot and my desk isn't that close to the toilet), defending most anything done by the NCAA, reveal that you invested with Pat Robertson in Liberian diamonds or gold and would do it again if you could, or dis Mr. Danger when he reminds of us "International Talk Like A Pirate Day". Otherwise, I am very interested in what you say even if not in how often you say it.