Irthnvesl's complaint about dave c's devotional

A free-wheeling forum for discussion of Christian issues.

Moderators: Pastor Gary, The J2 Mod Squad

valley
Ranking in the posts...
Ranking in the posts...
Posts: 291
Joined: January 28th, 2007, 8:48 am
Location: USA,Georgia

Postby valley » December 16th, 2008, 6:50 am

crispfin wrote:
valley wrote:
crispfin wrote:If one truly wants to show Jesus to someone, then they should strive to do it at all times and in all ways. It is quite easy to tell someone "Jesus loves them". It's even easier to threaten them with hellfire and promises of divine retribution and have smug pride over one's own rightness. What's hard is to show kindness even when you disagree with the person or they are rude. It's hard because it demands something from us. It demands we swallow anger and pride, and it's not easy. I don't know Tim or irthn personally, and I may not agree with them on things, but I feel I must show them love and respect as people made in God's image, who I, if I profess to follow Christ, have been called to be a brother and a servant to.


I like this. It reminds me of a bumper sticker on the back of a van the other day. "God wants spiritual fruit nor religious nuts."

:lol: I think I need to get that one.


:lol:

typo alert: It was meant to read: God wants spiritual fruit not religious nuts.

User avatar
scooter
--== J2 ==--
Posts: 4976
Joined: January 29th, 2003, 3:58 pm
Location: USA,Florida

Postby scooter » December 16th, 2008, 6:50 am

crispfin wrote:And what word did I go against?


Response: I wouldn't begrudge you from following the way the Lord might lead you, however the premise of universal unconditional acceptance of sinners with candy coated love goes against many scriptures.

For instance if the Lord leads me to rebuke Tim and leads you to serve him and hug him who is correct?

I profess to follow the same Christ. Is my rebuke not based in love?
What we need here is a good revival! lol

User avatar
Russell Roberts
Hey, hey, hey
Posts: 1617
Joined: September 30th, 2008, 1:19 pm
Location: USA,Mississippi
Contact:

Postby Russell Roberts » December 16th, 2008, 6:55 am

We are to rebuke those inside the body, not those outside the body - that is what God does.

1Co 5:9 I wrote you in my letter not to associate with sexually immoral people.
1Co 5:10 In no way did I mean the immoral people of this world, or the greedy and swindlers and idolaters, since you would then have to go out of the world.
1Co 5:11 But now I am writing to you not to associate with anyone who calls himself a Christian who is sexually immoral, or greedy, or an idolater, or verbally abusive, or a drunkard, or a swindler. Do not even eat with such a person.
1Co 5:12 For what do I have to do with judging those outside? Are you not to judge those inside?

User avatar
scooter
--== J2 ==--
Posts: 4976
Joined: January 29th, 2003, 3:58 pm
Location: USA,Florida

Postby scooter » December 16th, 2008, 6:58 am

irthnvesl wrote:We are to rebuke those inside the body, not those outside the body - that is what God does.

1Co 5:9 I wrote you in my letter not to associate with sexually immoral people.
1Co 5:10 In no way did I mean the immoral people of this world, or the greedy and swindlers and idolaters, since you would then have to go out of the world.
1Co 5:11 But now I am writing to you not to associate with anyone who calls himself a Christian who is sexually immoral, or greedy, or an idolater, or verbally abusive, or a drunkard, or a swindler. Do not even eat with such a person.
1Co 5:12 For what do I have to do with judging those outside? Are you not to judge those inside?


Response: Well, if someone was once a part of the body which catagory do they fall into?
What we need here is a good revival! lol

User avatar
Russell Roberts
Hey, hey, hey
Posts: 1617
Joined: September 30th, 2008, 1:19 pm
Location: USA,Mississippi
Contact:

Postby Russell Roberts » December 16th, 2008, 6:59 am

Outside the body.

User avatar
scooter
--== J2 ==--
Posts: 4976
Joined: January 29th, 2003, 3:58 pm
Location: USA,Florida

Postby scooter » December 16th, 2008, 7:04 am

irthnvesl wrote:Outside the body.


Response: Well atleast you're not Baptist.
What we need here is a good revival! lol

User avatar
Russell Roberts
Hey, hey, hey
Posts: 1617
Joined: September 30th, 2008, 1:19 pm
Location: USA,Mississippi
Contact:

Postby Russell Roberts » December 16th, 2008, 7:05 am

:lol: :lol: :lol:

User avatar
scooter
--== J2 ==--
Posts: 4976
Joined: January 29th, 2003, 3:58 pm
Location: USA,Florida

Postby scooter » December 16th, 2008, 7:09 am

I have and do treat Jude2 like a body.
What we need here is a good revival! lol

crispfin
Hey, hey, hey
Posts: 1870
Joined: September 11th, 2004, 8:00 am
Location: USA,Texas

Postby crispfin » December 16th, 2008, 7:17 am

scooter wrote:
crispfin wrote:And what word did I go against?


Response: I wouldn't begrudge you from following the way the Lord might lead you, however the premise of universal unconditional acceptance of sinners with candy coated love goes against many scriptures.

For instance if the Lord leads me to rebuke Tim and leads you to serve him and hug him who is correct?

I profess to follow the same Christ. Is my rebuke not based in love?

I think you've caricatured what I've said. Even rebukes must be done in love. I would actually see little difference between a rebuke and showing kindness. Both are a call to the conscience of the one that receives it. Both can be mismanaged.

User avatar
scooter
--== J2 ==--
Posts: 4976
Joined: January 29th, 2003, 3:58 pm
Location: USA,Florida

Postby scooter » December 16th, 2008, 7:20 am

crispfin wrote:
scooter wrote:
crispfin wrote:And what word did I go against?


Response: I wouldn't begrudge you from following the way the Lord might lead you, however the premise of universal unconditional acceptance of sinners with candy coated love goes against many scriptures.

For instance if the Lord leads me to rebuke Tim and leads you to serve him and hug him who is correct?

I profess to follow the same Christ. Is my rebuke not based in love?

I think you've caricatured what I've said. Even rebukes must be done in love. I would actually see little difference between a rebuke and showing kindness. Both are a call to the conscience of the one that receives it. Both can be mismanaged.


Response: Yep, some save with compassion others may be saved by jerking a knot in their tail. RSV
What we need here is a good revival! lol

crispfin
Hey, hey, hey
Posts: 1870
Joined: September 11th, 2004, 8:00 am
Location: USA,Texas

Postby crispfin » December 16th, 2008, 7:26 am

scooter wrote:I think you've caricatured what I've said. Even rebukes must be done in love. I would actually see little difference between a rebuke and showing kindness. Both are a call to the conscience of the one that receives it. Both can be mismanaged.


Response: Yep, some save with compassion others may be saved by jerking a knot in their tail. RSV[/quote]
Is that the "Revised Scooter Version"? :wink:

valley
Ranking in the posts...
Ranking in the posts...
Posts: 291
Joined: January 28th, 2007, 8:48 am
Location: USA,Georgia

Postby valley » December 16th, 2008, 7:29 am

crispfin wrote:
scooter wrote:I think you've caricatured what I've said. Even rebukes must be done in love. I would actually see little difference between a rebuke and showing kindness. Both are a call to the conscience of the one that receives it. Both can be mismanaged.


Response: Yep, some save with compassion others may be saved by jerking a knot in their tail. RSV

Is that the "Revised Scooter Version"? :wink:[/quote]

I thought it was the Redneck Standard Version.

User avatar
scooter
--== J2 ==--
Posts: 4976
Joined: January 29th, 2003, 3:58 pm
Location: USA,Florida

Postby scooter » December 16th, 2008, 7:54 am

crispfin wrote:
scooter wrote:Response: Yep, some save with compassion others may be saved by jerking a knot in their tail. RSV



Is that the "Revised Scooter Version"? :wink:


Response: I reckon, but either would do. 8)
What we need here is a good revival! lol

User avatar
dolfan
Established Member
Posts: 8016
Joined: March 17th, 2004, 1:25 pm
Location: USA,Alabama
Contact:

Postby dolfan » December 16th, 2008, 9:20 am

I've missed out! WHEW!!!!

I read the 1st couple of pages of this thread, then started at the other end and read backwards. I've done that a few times on other longer heated threads.

So, I'm jumping in on this, uninvited.

We all know, to some degree, each other, especially after hanging around for a bit. I'm one of those guys that probably is too tolerant at times of things. That's a flaw I have. And, I'm 41 and probably not going to change on that now. BUT ...... I have a hard time buying into this idea that Scooter has pathological anything, and that even if he did, that the protocol for better living is through the mental health profession as against the faithful following of Christ. Tim, buddy, I try to engage you where you are, and I personally enjoy our own exchanges. Yet, there's a lot of merit to Scooter's challenge here to you. And, I accept that you deny Christ, and naturally you would deny the conclusions Scooter reaches. You've said that you've chosen only that which is good and praiseworthy and noble. But, you say you reject the core truth of the faith of the One who alone perfectly emobided those virtues and more -- that He died and rose again. Now, I don't condemn your choice. You and you alone will (or, if you're right and we're wrong, won't) account for it. As long as interaction happens here, though, you're coming from a perspective so out of phase with that of most people here that you're bound to feel these frequent disconnects as something more personal, something more direct and even sinister. I can't help that, and I don't if anyone can. And, to some extent, there is a sense of attack from you by some here. I don't think that is all that sinister although others seem to, and it may just be a function of the fact that you're not a believer. Don't know if anyone can help that, either. But, it is what it is --- a mismatch.

Now, IMO, mismatches are made in heaven, if you will. We can get all philosophical about it, and I enjoy that immensely, but you just get to a point where the rubber meets the road. You, my friend, have walked into a room of brighter and dimmer lights (I'm the dim one, in case you wonder :lol: ). And, I'd just suggest to you, flat out without apology, that you hate the light. But, you're not used to that. You are a deep thinker, a reader, a self-informed guy, someone who has done what most of us dream to do and that is be more learned in many things than we are. In your own mind, your own reality, there's a strong sense that "hey, this makes sense to me", and you've worked out a way to cope with it. And, so, you're enlightened. But, it is self-enlightenment. We don't really buy into that idea so much, that is, self-enlightenment. We believe that Jesus is the light, and that light shines in the darkness, and it is the light of men. It isn't just a doctrinal point or a proverb, but a reality to us much in the way that your working-out of things is a reality to you.

Here's the rubber-meets-the-road part: If you're right, and you are enlightened, what's the answer?? If WE who believe are right, and we are given God's light in Christ within us, what's the answer?? I can tell you what I understand it to be ---- the church. The answer is the church. The only body of people that exists in this reality, this world, this order of things, the only body of people who are actually equipped and shown how to live in the ways that you, in your fondest dreams, would hope could be for real, is the church. There's no other. We don't do it, but we're real just the same. And, the thing that gets me about this is that you are one of a handful of people who probably could help in a practical way to change the church in our own society from a group of self-centered protectors of truth against the world into a group of lovers of God who clear hurdles of humanity to dive into the greatest pool of hope that ever has been. Your own ability to scale through so much stuff, intellectually, is the work of a linguist, as I know you are. You could be a translator of the written word of Jesus' love plan into an actual lover of people as Jesus' plan demands. You could be just awesome at it.

But you have decided not to. And, there's no small amount of angst about that fact here. So, you know, keep coming at these people but you'll have to face up to the fact that responses like Scooter's to you are not going to go away. If it isn't here, you'll encounter it somewhere, eventually, because another fact is you can't get away from this no matter how hard you try. And, this isn't a plea to just stop and surrender. No, I won't patronize you that way. But, I will say simply and plainly as I know how that you are not going to find greater welcome for your working-out of things as a key to some entry into the community of those who follow Jesus. You'll find challenge. And, challenge gets kinda ugly. It isn't appetizing.

As for Dave C posting here ..... wow, that seems like a distant idea 10 pages later into this thread ..... I don't see the beef. Big whoop. I'm not a big devotional reader. He's done it for as long as I've been around. You'll notice that he gets views and no responses. You'll also notice, again, that Pastor Gary is the owner here and Dave C posting his devotionals on the general discussion forum is right because PG says so. And, them's the breaks.
Last edited by dolfan on December 16th, 2008, 10:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
Human government bears the same relation to hell as the church bears to heaven. (David Lipscomb, On Civil Government, 72).

Gerald Creasy

Postby Gerald Creasy » December 16th, 2008, 9:52 am

Tim Elston wrote:
irthnvesl wrote:Ok. Tim, do you believe that Jesus Christ died and rose from the dead?


No, I don't, Russell. I guess that's the all important reason to make me live the rest of my life as an outcast among friends, isn't it? The irony of love.



Was it your inability to deal with moral failings which brought you to that conclusion or do you actually believe that that is the proper choice of someone with gargantuan intelligence?????????????????


Return to “Jude 2 General Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests

Login  •  Register