Postby dolfan » January 7th, 2009, 10:48 am
You can never, ever use assassination of a public official as a rhetorical device or joke to make a point.
If it was just her being "over the top" one time, I could even dismiss it as just that. But, she has done it before and after the Stevens "rat poison" remark.
She entitled a 2006 column critical of Lincoln Chaffee (a funny article, by the way), "They Shot The Wrong Lincoln".
She wrote a book about Clinton's presidency and said that among people who weren't too stupid to know that he was guilty in the Lewinsky affair, "there would be debates only about whether to impeach or assassinate."
Here's the thing: Ann Coulter is sharp as a razor. She's too sharp for most, but that doesn't bother me. So's Rush, but I like him. What bothers me is that she crosses this particular line, without apology and habitually. (She even uses it regarding newspaper and TV reporters, but that's not so big a deal to me as I regard their expressions as so much gum on the bottom of my shoe anyway. The day after used car salesmen jokes become inherently indecent, it will be improper to make jokes about newspaper and TV reporters.) So, I don't buy into anything else she says. As long as that is one of her weapons, I'm not influenced by the woman.
Human government bears the same relation to hell as the church bears to heaven. (David Lipscomb, On Civil Government, 72).