Full Quiver wrote:Sorry but from what I have heard the bill does not name Acorn as a recipient of any such funds. Acorn will be eligible as will many, many other groups. We need to watch what we pass on as truth. If I am wrong please clear me up but FOX News has already stated the same as I.
Yes, FQ but as I said, ACORN is the likely recipient of the funds because of the nature of the funds and the scope of ACORN. Much like Halliburton wasn't specifically named for certain contracts under Bush, but was the likely (and eventually the actual) recipient.
If Obama signed a bill to make a million dollars available to red pots manned by people ringing bells outside of shopping centers, and the headlines said "Salvation Army gets $1M in new Obama Bill" even though SA isn't specifically named, it would not be a terrible stretch (although there is a possiblity some other group will get
some of it).
There was another thread discussing bias in the media. I posted my dissatisfaction with the fact, stating that news entities should report fact without slant. I was quickly reminded that they have a right to do so.