Postby dolfan » May 26th, 2009, 11:54 pm
Mt. 27:25 was, indeed, an acknowledgement of the responsibility of the angry mob that demanded Jesus' crucifixion. They said it because Pilate had just right then told them that he was innocent of "this man's blood". They were saying, "Look we don't care. Just kill him. Blame us."
I would say that they got their wish in AD 70. I wouldn't say that they were inviting curses with their words. In this case, their words were actions, not just utterances. Their words were a popular vote, so to speak, for a death sentence on Jesus. Pilate complied for all of the political reasons with which we're all familiar. And, by AD 70, those people -- who rejected Jesus -- and their children, all of whom had been invited by the totality of Jesus' words and actions, and whom He lamented because of that rejection in Matthew 23:37-39, realized exactly what He meant. Not that they eventually "came around", as it were, but God's judgment on rejecting Christ was rained down on that city.
In my own little opinion, and it is just mine, it is too far to blame Israel's sufferings today as a result of some curse or even a consequence of that moment where the mob compelled Pilate to execute the Lord. A lot of nasty things through history have been done to the Jewish people, in part, because of that idea that they had it coming. God's judgment on the Jewish people was complete in AD 70. His only remaining judgment for rejecting Him is the one common to all who reject Him of every nation.
So, did that mob invite a curse? Not exactly. They invited a consequence. They were rewarded with exactly what they themselves were willing to accept. Far from being a curse, Jesus had pleaded with them to come under His wing like a hen gathering her chicks. Up until that moment of truth, that mob of mad Jerusalem-dwelling Jews was invited to be part of the new nation that Jesus was "calling out of darkness into His marvelous light," one that was ordained from all nations. After that moment, when they essentially sealed Jesus' fate in terms of the necessary human actions to accomplish God's redeeming work at Calvary, they were the objects of Jesus' woes. They were willing recipients of that responsibility, as demonstrated by their cry in Mt. 25:27, and they were accountable for it in AD 70.
Human government bears the same relation to hell as the church bears to heaven. (David Lipscomb, On Civil Government, 72).