Postby dolfan » September 28th, 2009, 6:25 am
1. One, two or three more hours of school time a day will not make kids better educated in the "Three R's" nor will it increase their skill level on any task. I don't know of many teachers complaining of "not enough time in the day to teach". Good grief, seems from anecdotal evidence at least, that some percentage of kids -- a substantial one -- is on some kind of ADD medicine. Cooping them in for more of the day will certainly cure them, won't it?
2. This is a design to separate children from home. That's all it is. It increases the power of the education lobby and unions, and weakens the family and the authority of the parent. My child will be out of school at 3 P.M. if I have to come in and get her out. I'm not going to let the government tell me how much "schooling" she is to have; what helps her is what she learns, not having more hours she's in the grips of government custodians.
3. This heightens the sinister nature of Obama's speech to the schoolkids a few weeks back. This is a planned programmatic takeover of the home by the government. If my local school or district develops its own plan, not motivated by any carrot or stick from the Federal government, I might consider it. But, that's never going to happen. So, we're back to the only other option --- obeisance to the Federal power or resistance. They want your children more than they want anything else. Like people say of their firearms, though, they'll have to pry mine from my cold, dead fingers. Obama, Federal Government, NEA, public education lobby --- you don't get my daughter.
Human government bears the same relation to hell as the church bears to heaven. (David Lipscomb, On Civil Government, 72).