Postby RamboPreacher » February 26th, 2011, 2:38 pm
the look: dunno, it is nice for me as an old guy, cause it's easy to take care of my hair. (or lack thereof.)
as for his universalism approach, it's not new, that whole paradigm isn't new. it is unfortunate, but it is chock-full-o-non-Biblical worldview.
what's fair, what's just, what's right; it isn't up to us to decide. Is God Love? yes, absolutely, but that is not Him in totality. the whole God is Love idea and thought-process/paradigm and dare I say "Christian perspective" is incorrect, I think.
you can't have Him being Love, unless there is justice, and righteousness based on an absolute set of moralities. if, as eluded to, those morals are dynamic and cultural based; then love would have to fluctuate as well.
I have been thinking about this a lot lately. we talk about Gods anointing, as example, as if it is meted out at quantifiable levels, based on what we perceive to be the need. but I don't think that's how it works. I think that God's anointing is what it is. our application, and obedience is where the perception of application comes to play.
Thanks, Brent "RamboPreacher" Hoefling